# AAC: 04 Dec 2025 (Q&A) **URL:** \ **Category:** At Any Cost\ **Created:** [December 5, 2025, 1:18am UTC](https://omnifora.com/t/aac-04-dec-2025-q-a/4766 "2025-12-05T01:18:37Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mahler](https://omnifora.com/user_avatar/omnifora.com/mahler/32/7_2.png) [@mahler](https://omnifora.com/u/mahler)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2025, 1:18am UTC](https://omnifora.com/t/aac-04-dec-2025-q-a/4766/1 "2025-12-05T01:18:37Z")
# Episode Information - **Date** : 2025-12(Dec)-04(Thu) - **Number** : S2025E06 - **Links** : - Episode: [04 Dec 2025 (Q&A) | Corey J. Mahler Podcasts](https://podcasts.coreyjmahler.com/2025/12/04-dec-2025-qa/) - Transcript: [e0006.vtt](https://aac.cdn.coreyjmahler.com/transcripts/e0006.vtt) - Other Platforms: - Video: - YouTube: - Rumble: - Original Broadcasts - YouTube: - X: ---
**Author:** ![mahler](https://omnifora.com/user_avatar/omnifora.com/mahler/32/7_2.png) [@mahler](https://omnifora.com/u/mahler)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2025, 1:18am UTC](https://omnifora.com/t/aac-04-dec-2025-q-a/4766/2 "2025-12-05T01:18:51Z")
# Episode Wiki _This is the episode wiki — trusted users can edit it._ ---
**Author:** ![mahler](https://omnifora.com/user_avatar/omnifora.com/mahler/32/7_2.png) [@mahler](https://omnifora.com/u/mahler)\ **Post date:** [December 5, 2025, 1:19am UTC](https://omnifora.com/t/aac-04-dec-2025-q-a/4766/3 "2025-12-05T01:19:02Z")
# Transcript WEBVTT 00:00:03.720 → 00:00:05.740 Welcome to the At Any Cost Podcast. 00:00:05.740 → 00:00:06.600 I am Corey J. 00:00:06.600 → 00:00:10.620 Mahler, and it is the 4th of December, 2025. 00:00:10.620 → 00:00:16.100 This is episode six, which also happens to be the sixth Q&A episode. 00:00:16.100 → 00:00:22.540 I have a number of questions that were submitted various ways, including via the forum, thankfully. 00:00:22.540 → 00:00:24.320 I’ll go over that at the end. 00:00:25.380 → 00:00:29.060 I think that I will be able to get through all of the questions tonight, most likely. 00:00:29.280 → 00:00:32.300 I think that it won’t take more than an hour or so. 00:00:32.300 → 00:00:35.560 Watch it wind up taking an hour and a half now that I’ve said that. 00:00:35.560 → 00:00:40.340 At any rate, I see green for all of the platforms except for Kick. 00:00:40.340 → 00:00:42.580 I know why that one’s not working. 00:00:42.580 → 00:00:46.840 It’s because apparently their bitrate cap is even lower than I thought it was. 00:00:46.840 → 00:00:59.560 So either I might not use them, or I’ll figure out some way to transcode that so that the quality is not terrible elsewhere, because other platforms happily accept a higher bitrate. 00:00:59.560 → 00:01:02.740 It’s just apparently Kick does not. 00:01:02.740 → 00:01:04.680 So… 00:01:04.680 → 00:01:10.580 That being said, there will be links, of course, to where you can submit questions and everything like that. 00:01:10.580 → 00:01:14.360 In the description should already be there in this case. 00:01:14.360 → 00:01:23.840 And high quality audio is available after the fact, usually a day or two lag for that, because I record the audio locally and then upload that high quality audio. 00:01:24.780 → 00:01:27.680 And you can subscribe to that the same way you would any other podcast. 00:01:27.680 → 00:01:38.560 You can use the direct RSS link, which is obviously recommended, because that can’t be censored, unless Cloudflare decides to censor me, in which case, there’s nothing I can do about that. 00:01:38.560 → 00:01:44.020 So, that being said, we will jump into the first question here. 00:01:45.600 → 00:01:51.460 The first question is about introductory resources for Lutheranism. 00:01:51.460 → 00:01:58.100 What books would you recommend as an introduction to Lutheranism, especially for someone from a reformed background? 00:01:58.100 → 00:02:03.180 I read long, dense books, so I’m open to reading such resources if they are worthwhile. 00:02:04.700 → 00:02:17.080 Now for that, obviously, the first recommendation is just going to be the Book of Concord, which will already get you about 1,000 to 1,200 pages worth, so I guess that meets the requirement for long, dense books. 00:02:17.080 → 00:02:19.460 But parts of it aren’t that dense. 00:02:19.460 → 00:02:26.360 The Augsburg Confession is very readable, the Catechism is very readable, but it is a long book. 00:02:26.360 → 00:02:28.780 And so that would be my first recommendation. 00:02:28.780 → 00:02:33.780 I was going to see if I had it on my desk here, but it’s up on my shelf, so I won’t bother grabbing one. 00:02:33.780 → 00:02:41.320 You can either read that via the physical book, you can purchase that from CPH, or find it secondhand, you’ll find it much cheaper. 00:02:41.320 → 00:02:44.380 Any of the translations that exist in English are going to be fine. 00:02:44.380 → 00:02:45.340 You don’t have to worry about those. 00:02:45.340 → 00:02:49.280 They have not played games with translating the Book of Concord yet. 00:02:50.220 → 00:02:52.480 So, whichever one you want. 00:02:52.480 → 00:03:17.720 I would recommend the Reader’s Edition second, not because it’s my favorite in terms of the translation quality, and by that I don’t mean, I want to be specific, I don’t mean that the other translations are inferior in terms of accuracy, but the type of English that is used in the translation, I prefer the older, more complex English of the Triglada, which is available free online. 00:03:18.260 → 00:03:21.680 That’s the website that I maintain, the [bookofconghor.org](http://bookofconghor.org). 00:03:21.680 → 00:03:24.940 So either way is fine. 00:03:24.940 → 00:03:31.220 But in addition to that, you should grab Melonkhthen’s and Caridion, his basically small catechism. 00:03:31.220 → 00:03:34.920 He has a condensed version of what Lutherans teach. 00:03:34.920 → 00:03:40.460 That has always been very highly recommended down through the centuries, so I would definitely recommend grabbing that book. 00:03:40.460 → 00:03:44.200 In addition to that, Luther on Galatians is an excellent book. 00:03:44.200 → 00:03:46.520 That one is just a general recommendation for any Christian. 00:03:47.360 → 00:03:55.520 Luther treats the Gospel in the Book of Galatians excellently in that volume, so go ahead and grab his Commentary on Galatians. 00:03:57.280 → 00:04:09.500 For those who want denser materials, and so that goes to sort of the second part of this question, or the subset of the question, Martin Chemnitz is going to be the general recommendation. 00:04:09.500 → 00:04:12.380 Now, many things by Luther are of course worth your time. 00:04:12.380 → 00:04:14.060 You can go and read those. 00:04:14.060 → 00:04:15.200 Pick whichever one interests you. 00:04:15.320 → 00:04:16.460 He has collections of sermons. 00:04:16.460 → 00:04:18.000 He has commentaries on various books. 00:04:18.000 → 00:04:21.320 He has an eight-volume set on Genesis, for instance. 00:04:21.320 → 00:04:23.720 I have that on my shelves here. 00:04:23.720 → 00:04:33.400 But Martin Chemnitz is going to be the one you want for sort of a dense theological treatment of these topics from a Lutheran perspective. 00:04:33.400 → 00:04:35.660 In particular, I’m looking at the set here on my shelves. 00:04:35.660 → 00:04:37.340 That’s why I’m looking at direction. 00:04:37.340 → 00:04:47.480 In particular, he treats the Council of Trent in four volumes, so that’s a response to the Roman Catholics, the Council of Trent being their response to the Reformation, to the Lutherans. 00:04:47.480 → 00:04:49.480 He also has a multi-volume. 00:04:49.480 → 00:04:56.480 It’s three volumes, but unfortunately, CPH published it as two, which means the second one is enormous, quite frankly. 00:04:56.480 → 00:05:02.180 His Losy Theologiki, which is various different subjects in theology. 00:05:02.180 → 00:05:04.020 That one is very worthwhile. 00:05:04.020 → 00:05:09.020 He has an apology of the Book of Concord, which goes into depth on some of those things a little bit. 00:05:09.020 → 00:05:10.000 Those are very worth grabbing. 00:05:10.740 → 00:05:32.960 In addition to those resources, two that I would very highly recommend, particularly for someone in the American context, Franz Pieper, his Christian Dogmatics, which is a three-volume, goes over basically all of theology in three volumes, does a very good job of it, many references in that, so you can find additional resources. 00:05:32.960 → 00:05:36.320 And then CFW Valter, the founder of the LCMS. 00:05:36.320 → 00:05:43.700 He has a number of volumes, really almost anything written by him, you’re going to enjoy reading, and it will be profitable. 00:05:43.700 → 00:05:50.740 But particularly in this case, I would say, grab Law and Gospel, and his book on predestination for obvious reasons. 00:05:50.740 → 00:05:57.160 If you’re coming from a reform background, you’re going to have questions about the differences with regard to our teachings on election. 00:05:57.160 → 00:06:00.360 And so his volume on predestination is excellent. 00:06:00.360 → 00:06:09.420 And then finally, if you are really into sort of the getting into the weeds, Gerhard would be the recommendation from the Lutheran camp. 00:06:09.420 → 00:06:17.720 That’s not a general recommendation, because most people will not read him very profitably, but it’s there if you are deeply invested and interested in these subjects. 00:06:17.720 → 00:06:19.500 And he has many volumes. 00:06:19.500 → 00:06:25.560 They have not all been translated yet, so I guess bonus points if you know Latin and German, and a few other things. 00:06:25.560 → 00:06:29.280 But if you don’t know those, many of them have been translated. 00:06:29.280 → 00:06:32.640 CPH is currently working through translating them, so you can grab many of those volumes. 00:06:32.640 → 00:06:34.940 I have a number of those here on my shelves as well. 00:06:36.160 → 00:06:37.420 Those are the basic recommendations. 00:06:37.420 → 00:06:43.700 And then probably grab a copy of the Lutheran Study Bible, because the notes in that are actually very good. 00:06:43.700 → 00:06:47.480 I object to relatively little in them, which is surprising. 00:06:47.480 → 00:06:53.020 I’m sure you all know that’s surprising, but it is a very good resource, really, for any Christian. 00:06:53.020 → 00:06:54.000 I would highly recommend that. 00:06:54.000 → 00:06:58.000 It’s probably the best Study Bible currently available. 00:06:58.000 → 00:07:00.580 So moving on to the next question. 00:07:00.580 → 00:07:04.080 This is a continuation from last week. 00:07:04.160 → 00:07:04.840 Someone asked a question. 00:07:04.840 → 00:07:08.520 I didn’t really answer the entirety of it. 00:07:08.520 → 00:07:13.720 It was about Germany’s alliance with Japan and why Japan didn’t open a front with the Soviet Union. 00:07:13.720 → 00:07:23.320 I answered the second part, but not really the underlying question of, when should Christians form alliances with non-Christians? 00:07:23.320 → 00:07:29.180 Because obviously, in this case, Germany, a Christian country, Japan, not a Christian country. 00:07:29.180 → 00:07:32.220 Still to this day, Japan, not a Christian country, unfortunately. 00:07:34.020 → 00:07:36.960 Largely due to MacArthur, of course. 00:07:36.960 → 00:07:49.000 But insofar as alliances are concerned, I guess the general way that I could start would be by saying, Christians are permitted to use the imperial laws. 00:07:49.000 → 00:07:59.280 Now, that’s going to sound perhaps crazy to modern ears, but what that means, and the context in which that was said originally, was during the Reformation. 00:07:59.280 → 00:08:10.840 Because you had the Anabaptists and others who were basically saying that Christians shouldn’t have any dealings with the world, they shouldn’t use anything that is so-called secular, which is kind of ironic, given they’re dealing with the Holy Roman Empire at the time. 00:08:10.840 → 00:08:14.900 It’s not even actually truly secular like our modern government. 00:08:14.900 → 00:08:27.100 But the general rule is that Christians are allowed to use the secular courts, the secular laws, all of these things that are not indeed Christian, and today, unfortunately, are anti-Christian in many cases. 00:08:27.240 → 00:08:37.540 Because you are permitted to live your life, and states are also permitted to do things, like have alliances with other states, even if they are not Christian. 00:08:37.540 → 00:08:39.120 And so it’s going to be a wisdom call. 00:08:39.120 → 00:08:40.200 This is a political call. 00:08:40.200 → 00:08:42.680 This is not really a Christian call. 00:08:42.680 → 00:08:47.000 It’s not really a religious or a theological question so much. 00:08:47.000 → 00:08:48.760 This is politics. 00:08:48.760 → 00:08:53.200 Whether or not you have an alliance with another nation is a matter of politics. 00:08:53.200 → 00:09:01.600 Now as Christians, should we try to use that in order to have missionaries in those lands, to try to convert them to Christianity? 00:09:01.600 → 00:09:03.740 The answer, of course, is yes. 00:09:03.740 → 00:09:10.900 To go back to the example of Japan, MacArthur should have told the emperor, you’re Christian now, convert your people. 00:09:10.900 → 00:09:13.120 That would have been the Christian response. 00:09:13.120 → 00:09:15.900 In fact, that’s how most Christians were converted. 00:09:15.900 → 00:09:21.280 They didn’t go around trying to convert every single man on the street as it were. 00:09:21.280 → 00:09:27.540 They converted the kings, they converted the princes, they converted the tribal chieftains, who then converted their people. 00:09:27.540 → 00:09:29.440 That is the usual way it goes. 00:09:29.440 → 00:09:32.160 And so politics has a role to play. 00:09:32.160 → 00:09:35.400 I could go back to the Book of Concord, which I just mentioned. 00:09:35.400 → 00:09:38.220 The documents in that are signed by Christian princes. 00:09:38.220 → 00:09:39.540 They’re not signed by pastors. 00:09:39.540 → 00:09:41.980 In most cases, there are some documents that are. 00:09:41.980 → 00:09:50.060 But the men who presented those things, the men who advanced them, the men who championed them, made them possible, were politicians. 00:09:50.060 → 00:09:53.760 Were, of course, hereditary politicians because it was an aristocracy. 00:09:53.760 → 00:09:55.880 This is the Holy Roman Empire. 00:09:55.880 → 00:10:01.400 But those men were not first and foremost pastors or theologians. 00:10:01.400 → 00:10:03.100 This was a matter of politics. 00:10:03.100 → 00:10:12.160 And so there is an intersection between Christianity and politics that many men modernly do not want to recognize because it makes them uncomfortable. 00:10:12.160 → 00:10:13.520 There are a number of reasons for that. 00:10:13.520 → 00:10:25.900 I won’t get into them now, perhaps in response to a future question, but I think that generally addresses the question here of what Christian nations should do with regard to alliances specifically with non-Christian nation. 00:10:25.900 → 00:10:27.780 The answer is, it’s politics. 00:10:27.780 → 00:10:29.360 It’s a wisdom call. 00:10:32.600 → 00:10:37.140 The third question here, I will read the content of that one. 00:10:37.140 → 00:10:43.580 Can you recommend works that explain to me why some art is beautiful and some art is degenerate? 00:10:43.580 → 00:10:46.420 What factors make art beautiful or degenerate? 00:10:46.420 → 00:10:52.200 I know Jackson Pollock paintings are degenerate, but I cannot entirely explain why. 00:10:52.200 → 00:10:55.280 Do the transcendentals play into this? 00:10:55.280 → 00:10:59.100 And so the answer, of course, to the last question there is yes. 00:10:59.100 → 00:11:00.800 The transcendentals play a role in this. 00:11:00.800 → 00:11:08.500 In fact, the transcendentals are a huge part of this, because beauty is a transcendental. 00:11:08.500 → 00:11:13.080 And so what you’re really recognizing is that some things are not beautiful. 00:11:13.080 → 00:11:19.800 And there are a number of ways that Christians down through the centuries have explained this, have addressed this topic. 00:11:19.800 → 00:11:27.560 But to answer the question here for reading recommendations, really, and then I’ll get into the transcendentals a little more, perhaps. 00:11:27.560 → 00:11:36.260 You are going to find this in many of the Church Fathers and many theologians, but not necessarily an in-depth treatment. 00:11:36.260 → 00:11:42.880 We are going to find a deeper treatment, perhaps more expansive, would be St. 00:11:42.880 → 00:11:45.920 Augustine deals with this in his Confessions. 00:11:47.300 → 00:11:59.420 I believe it’s Book 10, but he deals with the issue of beauty and incidentally also the issue of art, because anytime you are dealing with beauty, you are going to be dealing with art, because that’s the question here. 00:11:59.420 → 00:12:03.200 Is there a sort of connection between the two, a necessary connection? 00:12:03.200 → 00:12:04.840 The answer is yes. 00:12:04.840 → 00:12:08.100 Art that is beautiful is art. 00:12:08.100 → 00:12:10.820 Art that is ugly isn’t actually art. 00:12:10.820 → 00:12:21.980 It’s deliberately destructive, it’s subversive, and of course, you see the Jews involved very deeply in art that is meant, so called art, that is meant to undermine society and destroy it. 00:12:21.980 → 00:12:28.280 They’ll call all sorts of things art, but really the goal is the destruction of the beautiful, so it’s sort of the antithesis of art. 00:12:28.280 → 00:12:29.220 It’s an anti-art. 00:12:29.220 → 00:12:31.620 It’s something deeply evil. 00:12:31.620 → 00:12:36.460 But to keep up with the recommendations for readings, another one would be St. 00:12:36.460 → 00:12:38.520 Thomas Aquinas in his Summa. 00:12:38.520 → 00:12:40.880 He addresses this in the first part. 00:12:42.860 → 00:12:53.100 Boethius is going to be a general recommendation here that you’re going to see from basically anyone who answers this question and is familiar with the literature, the Consolation of Philosophy. 00:12:53.100 → 00:12:54.480 He deals with the issue in that book. 00:12:54.480 → 00:12:56.560 I would highly recommend that one. 00:12:56.560 → 00:13:01.400 Pseudodinicius is going to be another recommendation you’ll see here. 00:13:01.400 → 00:13:02.300 Someone of a mixed bag. 00:13:02.300 → 00:13:06.740 He gets into the mysticism a little bit more than I would prefer anyway. 00:13:06.740 → 00:13:08.560 Perhaps he will find something valuable there. 00:13:09.640 → 00:13:11.240 That is another potential reading for you. 00:13:11.240 → 00:13:14.200 The Divine Names will be the book you want from him. 00:13:14.200 → 00:13:19.760 And then I actually have a specific recommendation other than those ones as well. 00:13:19.760 → 00:13:22.760 I’ll go into sort of the philosophy a little bit more in a second here. 00:13:22.760 → 00:13:30.780 But another recommendation I have that came to mind when I was looking at this question would be Leisure as the Basis of Culture. 00:13:30.780 → 00:13:36.020 And I would recommend getting the double volume that also has The Philosophical Act, which is an essay. 00:13:36.020 → 00:13:37.980 Those are by Josef Pieper. 00:13:38.320 → 00:13:42.980 I grabbed my copy off my shelves before I started recording here. 00:13:42.980 → 00:14:00.640 I don’t know that I would recommend it to everyone, but any man who is Christian or even not a Christian and has an interest in the transcendentals, in beauty, in art, in philosophy particularly, I would very highly recommend reading this book. 00:14:00.640 → 00:14:04.540 It is a very good, very important book. 00:14:04.540 → 00:14:16.040 And you can think of it in some ways as sort of a superior philosophical, theological version of Hayek’s Road to Serfdom. 00:14:16.040 → 00:14:24.080 It’s more than that, but that can sort of couch it for men who are more familiar with that side of things than philosophy and theology. 00:14:24.080 → 00:14:26.700 But definitely highly recommend grabbing that book. 00:14:26.700 → 00:14:29.580 I think it’s a pretty cheap book these days. 00:14:30.640 → 00:14:44.600 But insofar as, I’ll go with Thomas Aquinas, insofar as Thomas Aquinas is concerned, he describes beauty and, of course, the convertibility of the transcendentals because God’s nature is one, God being one. 00:14:44.600 → 00:14:47.800 He is not composed to parts, the transcendentals are all one. 00:14:47.800 → 00:14:51.060 We speak of them in different terms because we’re human and we’re limited. 00:14:51.060 → 00:14:56.100 We can only deal with them in this sort of partitioned state and sense. 00:14:56.100 → 00:15:02.620 We can’t deal with them in terms of the totality because that would be dealing with an infinite, and we’re a finite. 00:15:02.620 → 00:15:05.720 We can’t deal with the infinite, of course. 00:15:05.720 → 00:15:11.160 But insofar as that goes, I actually want to pull up his quote here. 00:15:12.220 → 00:15:14.040 I’ll give it in Latin first. 00:15:14.040 → 00:15:25.760 But the quote from Aquinas is integrita siva perfectio debita proportio sive consonanti et claretas, which translated is just integrity or perfection. 00:15:25.760 → 00:15:29.080 This is speaking of the nature of the beautiful. 00:15:29.240 → 00:15:31.380 And so, it ties into artwork. 00:15:31.380 → 00:15:35.900 Integrity or perfection do proportion or harmony and clarity. 00:15:35.900 → 00:15:39.200 That is how he described beauty. 00:15:39.200 → 00:15:44.880 Those are the things that go into making up what we perceive as and call beauty. 00:15:44.880 → 00:15:51.080 And so, again, we’re dividing this into parts in order to speak of it in human comprehensible terms. 00:15:51.080 → 00:15:52.360 Because, again, God is infinite. 00:15:52.360 → 00:15:54.760 We can only look at him in portion. 00:15:54.760 → 00:15:56.140 We can look at him in part. 00:15:56.140 → 00:16:00.240 Except, of course, beholding Christ in which the fullness of deity dwells bodily. 00:16:00.240 → 00:16:04.720 So that’s a different topic for a different time, perhaps, though. 00:16:04.720 → 00:16:11.060 But insofar as the reading recommendations go, I think those are probably a good starting place. 00:16:11.060 → 00:16:17.740 And then you can get into a few of the other Church Fathers deal with beauty. 00:16:17.740 → 00:16:19.840 But I would say start there. 00:16:19.840 → 00:16:25.160 And if you read through all of that and want more recommendations, I can maybe make some more recommendations, or you’ll find them along the way. 00:16:25.860 → 00:16:32.860 Because some of these men will reference other authors, and then you can get into that stuff as well, sort of like looking at the footnotes. 00:16:32.860 → 00:16:37.720 They’re not going to have footnotes in most cases, but effectively the same thing. 00:16:37.720 → 00:16:47.640 But insofar as beauty and artwork is concerned a little more generally, yes, we’re dealing with the transcendentals here. 00:16:47.640 → 00:16:52.920 And so something that is not good, ultimately is also not beautiful. 00:16:53.680 → 00:16:59.380 Something that is not true ultimately is not beautiful because of the convertibility of the transcendentals. 00:17:00.540 → 00:17:08.100 So when you look at artwork that is degenerate, you recognize that, hopefully, you recognize that. 00:17:08.100 → 00:17:21.140 You should be very worried if you don’t, because if you don’t recognize something as degenerate when you see it, then it means that your sense of the beautiful, the true and the good has been dulled. 00:17:21.760 → 00:17:29.000 You have been poisoned by the culture to the extent where you no longer recognize these things when you see them. 00:17:29.000 → 00:17:43.740 So I think, of course, as partly as an attorney and partly as someone who’s dealt with the philosophy and things, I think of the famous comment from one of our Supreme Court justices when he was dealing with obscenity, speaking about pornography, he said, I know it when I see it. 00:17:43.740 → 00:17:53.900 And he’s absolutely right, because you do know evil when you see it, and you do know the good when you see it, because God has given you those things, he has built that into you. 00:17:53.900 → 00:17:59.840 You have a conscience, and you have a sense of the beautiful, you have a sense of the true, you have a sense of the good. 00:17:59.840 → 00:18:14.040 And things that run counter to those, which is to say, things that are opposed to God, things that run counter to God, are going to trigger that sense in you, and you’re going to recognize them as degenerate, as wicked, as evil. 00:18:14.040 → 00:18:22.200 And that’s why when you see paintings and other things by these evil men, and that’s part of it, of course, you can look at the nature of the man who created the work. 00:18:22.200 → 00:18:24.640 It is almost always going to follow. 00:18:24.640 → 00:18:26.520 Seldom is there going to be any disconnect there. 00:18:26.520 → 00:18:28.320 I can’t even think of an example. 00:18:28.320 → 00:18:30.340 As I sit here, I’m trying to think of one. 00:18:30.340 → 00:18:32.140 I can’t bring one to mind. 00:18:32.140 → 00:18:42.900 But even, I mean, maybe there are going to be men who are truly wicked degenerates in their life and produce a great work of literature. 00:18:42.900 → 00:18:51.520 That sometimes happens, but you’re going to know it when you see it, when it comes to artwork that is degenerate. 00:18:51.520 → 00:18:57.540 There are certain things, and of course, you can get into the mathematics, and you can start trying to break these things down. 00:18:57.540 → 00:19:00.680 But ultimately, it is a Gestalt. 00:19:00.680 → 00:19:03.800 It is something that is greater than the sum of its parts. 00:19:03.800 → 00:19:15.360 And so just looking at the fact that it has the golden ratio, or it has these other proportions that are pleasing to the human eye, or it does this, that, and the other, those things are important. 00:19:15.420 → 00:19:23.080 There’s nothing wrong with studying it in that way, but you have to recognize that it is a larger whole. 00:19:23.080 → 00:19:25.900 There is more to it than just those parts. 00:19:25.900 → 00:19:27.660 But it’s sort of like studying God. 00:19:27.660 → 00:19:37.240 We can study the different aspects, as we call them, of God, in an attempt to understand something of the totality, something of the whole. 00:19:37.240 → 00:19:41.440 You’ll never get to the whole in that way, but you will gain something. 00:19:42.260 → 00:19:45.740 By studying God’s goodness, you will gain something. 00:19:45.740 → 00:19:48.560 It won’t be a full understanding of God, but that’s not the point. 00:19:48.560 → 00:19:55.980 It’s sort of similar to when I make arguments for the existence of God, and someone will tell me, well, you didn’t prove the existence of the Christian God. 00:19:55.980 → 00:19:57.960 I’m not, that’s not what I’m doing. 00:19:57.960 → 00:20:02.060 I’m proving the existence of God first, and then you build up from there. 00:20:02.060 → 00:20:04.540 It’s similar to what you do here. 00:20:04.540 → 00:20:12.820 So, yes, you have a sense of the beautiful, and when you recognize something is degenerate, it’s because it’s gone against that sense of the beautiful. 00:20:12.820 → 00:20:15.240 It’s triggered a revulsion in you. 00:20:15.240 → 00:20:20.200 The same sort of thing that happens when functional men see homosexuality. 00:20:20.200 → 00:20:25.040 They respond in the same way they respond to literal garbage and rotting meat. 00:20:25.040 → 00:20:26.560 That’s because God has built that into you. 00:20:26.560 → 00:20:37.380 Unless society and your own degenerate behavior have so dulled your sense of the beautiful, of the true, of the good, you are going to recognize evil when you see it. 00:20:38.260 → 00:20:44.600 And so, that’s sort of my short answer on artwork and beauty and related matters, the transcendentals. 00:20:44.600 → 00:20:47.320 But definitely look at those reading recommendations. 00:20:47.320 → 00:20:53.260 I think those are probably, definitely the top ten, in the top ten, not the fullness of the top ten. 00:20:56.440 → 00:21:01.500 The next question is also a theological question, perhaps not surprisingly. 00:21:02.740 → 00:21:05.240 You have said that God hates sinners, not just sin. 00:21:05.620 → 00:21:10.240 How should we reconcile that with Romans 5.8, which says that God loves sinners? 00:21:10.240 → 00:21:15.640 And related to that, do you believe God has any love for the damned? 00:21:15.640 → 00:21:20.540 So, this one I actually want to start off by reading through a number of different verses. 00:21:20.580 → 00:21:22.520 This is a little bit of a Bible study here. 00:21:22.520 → 00:21:28.760 I will pull up Logos for that, because I think that’s going to certainly help us here. 00:21:30.000 → 00:21:36.100 And so, it probably helps if I have it open on my screen as well. 00:21:36.100 → 00:21:39.880 Okay. 00:21:39.880 → 00:21:42.780 We will start in the New Testament. 00:21:42.780 → 00:21:46.120 We will start with 1 John. 00:21:46.120 → 00:21:50.000 And I’m sorry for the keyboard noise, but I have a mechanical keyboard. 00:21:50.000 → 00:21:52.760 And I did not swap out for my quieter one. 00:21:54.460 → 00:21:58.700 Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love. 00:21:58.780 → 00:22:00.920 And that’s an important place to start. 00:22:00.920 → 00:22:06.120 We’re sort of getting back to the previous question with the transcendentals and the nature of God. 00:22:06.120 → 00:22:08.620 But God is his attributes. 00:22:08.620 → 00:22:12.280 But God is also described as hating, and there are many places in Scripture for that. 00:22:12.280 → 00:22:14.280 I won’t sort of jump ahead here. 00:22:14.280 → 00:22:18.340 But obviously, the next one has to be John 3.16. 00:22:18.340 → 00:22:23.380 We have to deal with this one, because obviously this is going to come up anytime we’re talking about love. 00:22:23.380 → 00:22:29.740 For God so loved the world that he gave his only son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 00:22:29.740 → 00:22:36.640 And I’ll stop there for now, although you should certainly go on and read the rest of at least John 3, perhaps the whole book of John. 00:22:36.640 → 00:22:47.500 But then the verse from Romans here that was part of the question, But God shows his love for us, and that while we were sinners, Christ died for us. 00:22:47.500 → 00:22:54.320 Which of course is true, absolutely, because we’re all born in sin, and sin, to my mother, conceived me to quote the Psalms. 00:22:55.240 → 00:23:01.620 However, it’s worth noting for this particular verse, that it says, while we were sinners. 00:23:01.620 → 00:23:08.880 This is speaking of those who are among the elect, those who are going to be justified before that happened. 00:23:08.880 → 00:23:12.080 And so, is this speaking of all sinners? 00:23:12.080 → 00:23:13.500 Not necessarily in this case. 00:23:13.500 → 00:23:20.400 I’m not going to say, and I’m not saying here, that God doesn’t love sinners in a certain sense. 00:23:20.400 → 00:23:29.380 Because that is the ultimate conclusion here that I’m going to draw, is that God both loves and hates sinners, those who are still in impenitent sin. 00:23:29.380 → 00:23:40.000 But to continue the sort of hodgepodge Bible study here, we will go also in Romans, but back to chapter 2. 00:23:40.000 → 00:23:49.080 Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? 00:23:49.080 → 00:23:52.100 And we’ll come back to that one in just a little bit here. 00:23:52.140 → 00:23:58.400 In fact, I’ll open a new window, so I don’t have to type that one again. 00:23:58.400 → 00:24:01.580 But continuing on here, we’ll go to 2nd Peter. 00:24:04.160 → 00:24:13.420 The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promises, some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. 00:24:13.420 → 00:24:18.400 And of course, this is a constant refrain throughout all of scripture. 00:24:19.480 → 00:24:24.140 God does not desire that any one spend eternity in hell. 00:24:24.140 → 00:24:26.340 God wants all to repent. 00:24:28.120 → 00:24:35.780 And in keeping with that theme, we’ll go to basically what Peter is paraphrasing here, which of course is Ezekiel. 00:24:35.780 → 00:24:37.780 Actually, I will pull this up in the Septuagint. 00:24:37.780 → 00:24:40.280 I’ll open a new tab here. 00:24:43.860 → 00:24:47.060 Always better to use the Septuagint when the option is there. 00:24:48.040 → 00:24:50.380 Say to them, I live, says the Lord. 00:24:50.380 → 00:24:53.080 I do not wish the death of the impious. 00:24:53.080 → 00:24:56.720 Rather, that the impious turn back from his way and live. 00:24:56.720 → 00:24:59.020 Turn back from your way by turning back. 00:24:59.020 → 00:25:02.480 And why are you dying, O house of Israel? 00:25:02.480 → 00:25:05.500 This is essentially what Peter is paraphrasing. 00:25:05.500 → 00:25:08.800 God wants the wicked to turn from their way. 00:25:08.800 → 00:25:11.520 He wants them to return to the right path. 00:25:11.520 → 00:25:13.700 He wants them to repent. 00:25:13.700 → 00:25:15.680 And that is for all sinners. 00:25:15.780 → 00:25:18.680 God does not begrudge anyone’s salvation. 00:25:18.680 → 00:25:22.440 God has not damned anyone from eternity past. 00:25:22.440 → 00:25:23.720 That is not how this works. 00:25:23.720 → 00:25:26.000 God wants everyone to repent. 00:25:26.000 → 00:25:30.980 And so does he love them necessarily, of course, or he wouldn’t want them to repent. 00:25:30.980 → 00:25:32.660 He would just cast them into hell and be done with it. 00:25:32.660 → 00:25:36.560 There wouldn’t be any desire to see them turn from their wicked ways. 00:25:36.560 → 00:25:38.580 And so, yes, God does love sinners. 00:25:42.700 → 00:25:46.280 But, of course, we have to deal with verses like… 00:25:48.500 → 00:25:50.740 Actually, I don’t want that one. 00:25:50.740 → 00:25:57.500 This is what happens when you are dealing with the Septuagint versus the Masoretic text. 00:25:57.500 → 00:26:00.100 Of course, the numbers are different. 00:26:00.100 → 00:26:03.800 But David, of course, you know which one I want here. 00:26:03.800 → 00:26:05.740 Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord? 00:26:05.740 → 00:26:07.100 I hate them with a perfect hatred. 00:26:07.240 → 00:26:10.040 I count them my enemies, right? 00:26:10.040 → 00:26:22.620 And so, when you are dealing with this, you have to deal with the fact, this is David speaking in the Spirit, saying what God desires. 00:26:22.620 → 00:26:24.080 God hates sinners. 00:26:24.080 → 00:26:35.780 And this sort of gets into sort of a philosophical problem here for the other side of this, not on my side, because I think my side is very consistent, and I will prove that here. 00:26:36.580 → 00:26:43.560 If someone says that they hate murder, that doesn’t really have any meaning. 00:26:43.560 → 00:26:47.520 Okay, you hate the abstraction that is murder. 00:26:47.520 → 00:26:49.600 Great. 00:26:49.600 → 00:26:51.560 But murderers commit murder. 00:26:51.560 → 00:26:54.980 And without a murderer, there is no murder. 00:26:54.980 → 00:26:56.520 The same thing for sin. 00:26:56.520 → 00:26:59.540 Without a sinner, there is no sin. 00:26:59.540 → 00:27:05.100 And so you can’t just hate the sin, because you don’t just hate some abstraction. 00:27:06.080 → 00:27:11.560 You hate the person who is doing the thing that you find detestable. 00:27:11.560 → 00:27:16.740 And so God hates the sinner, because God hates sin. 00:27:16.740 → 00:27:18.780 The sinner is the one who commits the sin. 00:27:18.780 → 00:27:20.440 Without the sinner, there is no sin. 00:27:20.440 → 00:27:22.420 Back to the murderer example. 00:27:26.540 → 00:27:30.640 Then to go to Hebrews, before I go back to Romans. 00:27:32.660 → 00:27:45.520 For if we go on sinning deliberately, after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for us, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries. 00:27:47.060 → 00:27:49.200 So does God love sinners? 00:27:49.200 → 00:27:50.380 Yes. 00:27:50.380 → 00:27:53.260 Does God hate impenitent sinners? 00:27:53.260 → 00:27:54.900 There’s no other way to deal with this verse. 00:27:54.900 → 00:27:57.180 The answer is yes, he certainly does. 00:27:57.180 → 00:28:03.920 And then to go back, as I said I would, to the book of Romans, starting with verse five this time. 00:28:03.920 → 00:28:12.940 But because of your hard and impenitent heart, you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath, when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed. 00:28:14.300 → 00:28:20.480 And so I guess that leads into the question, the last question there, in the series of questions here. 00:28:21.840 → 00:28:23.780 Does God have any love for the damned? 00:28:25.160 → 00:28:32.420 I think that the necessary answer to that is yes, because God loves the good. 00:28:32.420 → 00:28:37.360 And I’ve gone into this previously in previous episodes, but I’ll do it here as well. 00:28:37.360 → 00:28:38.840 Go over this again. 00:28:40.480 → 00:28:43.880 Everything that God creates is good. 00:28:43.880 → 00:28:47.160 Sin is not part of your essence. 00:28:47.160 → 00:28:50.600 Speaking in philosophical terms, difference between essence and accident. 00:28:50.600 → 00:28:52.600 An accident is a non-essential thing, basically. 00:28:52.680 → 00:28:54.660 It’s the summary of that. 00:28:55.860 → 00:29:03.340 So, your essence is good, because your essence, your nature, these things created by God, corrupted by sin. 00:29:03.340 → 00:29:07.240 So, sin is the accident corrupting your nature. 00:29:07.240 → 00:29:09.440 God does not love sin. 00:29:09.440 → 00:29:11.820 God hates sin. 00:29:11.820 → 00:29:19.020 And so, insofar as those who are in hell are impenitent sinners, God hates them. 00:29:19.020 → 00:29:21.460 But God loves them because they are his good creation. 00:29:22.660 → 00:29:29.820 This is, of course, somewhat difficult to deal with, but we recognize that there are times where you can hate and love something at the same time. 00:29:29.820 → 00:29:34.720 God can do it in an infinite way, because God is infinite and we are not. 00:29:34.720 → 00:29:40.620 So, the short answer is that, yes, God loves sinners, but he does also hate sinners. 00:29:40.620 → 00:29:54.400 And, of course, it should be a call to repentance, because you want to be someone who is in Christ, someone who is no longer juridically, someone who has been declared righteous for the sake of Christ. 00:29:54.400 → 00:30:03.600 And so, you are no longer counted a sinner, even though, of course, in this life, you are still a sinner up to the end, but you are not counted a sinner, because you’re in Christ. 00:30:03.600 → 00:30:21.860 So, all of these verses about wrath and eternal fire and all those things, and God’s hatred for sin, and, yes, the sinner should be a call to repentance, a call to be in Christ, to be someone who is no longer counted as a sinner, because you are covered by the blood of Christ. 00:30:26.340 → 00:30:35.320 The next question here, those are actually all the questions that I had from the forum for this particular episode. 00:30:35.320 → 00:30:38.060 I don’t believe there were any that I missed. 00:30:38.060 → 00:30:40.280 I will check just briefly here to make sure. 00:30:40.280 → 00:30:50.120 But I saw a few in the chat, so I will address those now, since I think we’ve got plenty of time right now, so. 00:30:53.200 → 00:30:59.700 Those are all of the questions from the forum for this episode, so I will scroll through the chat to look for some other ones. 00:30:59.700 → 00:31:04.120 I noticed one before I started recording, so I will address that one first. 00:31:05.460 → 00:31:08.480 The question that I noticed was about the Tish Raiden. 00:31:08.480 → 00:31:13.620 And I’ve addressed this one a number of times, and I could of course just point to that. 00:31:13.760 → 00:31:25.280 I’ve posted about it on X and my Telegram channel, but one of the things you have to understand, first and foremost, about Tish Raiden, is that they’re unreliable. 00:31:25.280 → 00:31:28.660 Because what a Tish Raiden is, is table talks. 00:31:28.660 → 00:31:32.620 It’s table speeches, but table talks, you can translate it either way into English. 00:31:32.620 → 00:31:38.180 For those who are wondering what on earth I’m talking about here as I keep saying a German word, table talks. 00:31:38.180 → 00:31:44.780 You’ve probably heard them only in regard to two men, Martin Luther and Adolf Hitler. 00:31:44.780 → 00:31:52.040 And they’re almost always used to attack those men by those who hate those men. 00:31:52.040 → 00:31:54.800 The problem is the essence of the thing. 00:31:54.800 → 00:32:02.300 A table talk is basically a dinner conversation, often involving beer, particularly in Martin Luther’s case, of course. 00:32:02.300 → 00:32:09.400 At this point, Adolf Hitler didn’t drink, so not in his case, but in the case of Martin Luther, he was probably drinking beer while he was saying these things. 00:32:09.400 → 00:32:27.340 If he said them, which is the problem here, he probably didn’t say them because it is recorded second, third, sometimes fourth hand, sometimes many years after the fact by someone who talked to someone who perhaps another level of abstraction talked to someone who was there. 00:32:28.680 → 00:32:39.440 Probably not the most reliable memory if you spent an evening drinking beer and joking, and then someone records it years later after a game of telephone. 00:32:39.440 → 00:32:45.220 So this is not the sort of source that a Christian should use or consider reliable. 00:32:45.220 → 00:32:57.880 We should rely on the writings and the actual speeches of these men that we have in copious amounts in both cases, instead of relying on hearsay, which is what would be called in a court of law. 00:32:57.960 → 00:33:07.520 And it would not be admissible in a court of law, because it’s completely ridiculous, the circumstances under which it was supposedly recorded and then transmitted. 00:33:07.520 → 00:33:11.500 Is that to say that there’s nothing in there that either of those men said? 00:33:11.500 → 00:33:14.780 No, the answer is probably they said some of those things. 00:33:14.780 → 00:33:21.060 But we cannot possibly discern which the men said and which the men did not say. 00:33:21.060 → 00:33:31.260 And so the Christian is going to want to rely on sources that are reliable, sources that are provable, and there are many of those. 00:33:31.260 → 00:33:38.540 In some case where Tisch-Reytner all that you have, that’s a more difficult call, because then it’s the only resource you have. 00:33:38.540 → 00:33:39.900 What do you do? 00:33:39.900 → 00:33:42.900 Well, you probably, as a Christian, give the man the benefit of the doubt. 00:33:42.900 → 00:33:49.520 But in the case of these two men, there’s no reason to resort to table talks. 00:33:49.520 → 00:33:54.140 There’s an entire bookshelf, a large bookshelf worth of Martin Luther’s writings. 00:33:54.140 → 00:33:56.160 We can go to those to see what he actually thought. 00:33:57.240 → 00:34:02.060 In the case of Hitler, of course, we have his book and many speeches. 00:34:02.060 → 00:34:04.340 We can go to those to see what he thought. 00:34:04.340 → 00:34:12.420 And so, of course, the part of the question here is Gerber’s diary and the table talks dealing with supposed anti-Christian sentiments. 00:34:12.420 → 00:34:17.600 And I’ll deal with Gerber’s diary after this bit here about the table talks. 00:34:20.180 → 00:34:24.360 When it comes to the table talks, again, unreliable, and so we look at the words of the man. 00:34:24.440 → 00:34:32.060 But one in particular that I want to turn to here, so I will actually pull up the browser here. 00:34:32.060 → 00:34:34.300 Let me pull that up. 00:34:34.300 → 00:34:38.660 I want to read just a little bit of a quote. 00:34:38.660 → 00:34:41.920 The Almighty created our nation by defending its existence. 00:34:41.920 → 00:34:43.620 We defend his work. 00:34:43.620 → 00:34:51.100 The fact that this defense is linked with unspeakable misfortune, suffering and pain beyond compare only makes us more attached to this nation. 00:34:51.720 → 00:34:56.760 But it also gives us the hardness we need to fulfill our duty, even in the worst crises. 00:34:56.760 → 00:34:58.520 Take a sip of tea here. 00:35:01.940 → 00:35:08.100 He of course goes on to speak about the bomb that detonated one and a half meters away from me on July 20th failed to wipe me out. 00:35:08.100 → 00:35:14.080 I see the fact that the Almighty protected me on that day as a confirmation of the mission given to me. 00:35:14.080 → 00:35:18.900 And of course he goes on, but this is the final radio broadcast to the German people. 00:35:20.600 → 00:35:22.480 He had no reason to lie here. 00:35:22.480 → 00:35:25.520 He would be dead shortly after this. 00:35:25.520 → 00:35:44.600 And so if he had actually believed the things that are claimed about him with regard to Christianity, this would have been the time to say them, because if you’re going to be dead shortly, there’s no where for propaganda at this point, because it doesn’t matter anymore with regard at least to this subject. 00:35:45.840 → 00:35:53.260 And I should be clear, this is the same thing that he said all through his political career, all through his life. 00:35:53.260 → 00:35:58.600 And so I would recommend reading that article that I wrote on Adolf Hitler’s Christianity. 00:35:58.600 → 00:36:00.960 It’s conveniently titled Adolf Hitler Christian. 00:36:00.960 → 00:36:03.220 You can find that probably just by Googling it. 00:36:03.220 → 00:36:05.340 You can probably find it with that term. 00:36:05.340 → 00:36:11.700 If you don’t find it, then just go to my website directly or add my last name, and then you’ll probably find it. 00:36:11.700 → 00:36:15.320 But the second part of the question is the Goebbels Diaries. 00:36:15.320 → 00:36:17.680 Why do I not find those reliable? 00:36:17.680 → 00:36:22.020 The reason I don’t find those reliable is very straightforward, very simple. 00:36:22.020 → 00:36:29.020 They were held for decades by the Soviets, and they did not permit anyone else to have access to them. 00:36:29.020 → 00:36:33.000 I don’t trust anything that comes out of the Soviets. 00:36:33.000 → 00:36:42.100 These are the people who started and perfected, before Photoshop, notably, editing political pictures to remove people they didn’t like. 00:36:42.100 → 00:36:46.920 I’m not going to trust something that they held for decades and say, oh, no, of course, we took this. 00:36:46.920 → 00:36:48.740 And notably, they don’t have the originals. 00:36:48.740 → 00:36:52.440 They basically have the equivalent at the time of a scan. 00:36:52.440 → 00:36:55.080 That’s what they have in their archives. 00:36:55.080 → 00:36:56.860 That’s what they claim to have in their archives. 00:36:56.860 → 00:36:57.640 I don’t believe it. 00:36:57.640 → 00:37:03.300 I simply do not believe that those men were trustworthy, because those were evil men. 00:37:04.080 → 00:37:06.220 Nothing the Soviets said is trustworthy. 00:37:06.220 → 00:37:09.000 Nothing they said should be believed. 00:37:09.000 → 00:37:26.740 In particular, when you’re dealing with someone, again, who is a Christian brother, or at least someone we should give the benefit of the doubt about being a Christian brother, and has this wealth of resources on these specific questions, we should rely on the things that are reliable, not the things that were held by godless communists. 00:37:30.380 → 00:37:32.060 Let me see if there is another question here. 00:37:33.020 → 00:37:34.560 Someone asked where to submit questions. 00:37:34.560 → 00:37:36.640 That should be in the description. 00:37:36.640 → 00:37:43.160 I see you are listening on X, so there should be a description there. 00:37:43.160 → 00:37:52.680 If there’s no description there, then you can just go to [omnifora.com](http://omnifora.com) and find the requests category, or any of the other platforms will have a description. 00:37:52.680 → 00:37:53.820 You can find it there. 00:37:53.820 → 00:37:58.480 I will also link it in my Telegram chat after this, just to make that a little easier. 00:37:58.480 → 00:37:59.880 My Telegram channel, I should say. 00:38:09.378 → 00:38:13.418 Is what David is saying about hatred descriptive or prescriptive. 00:38:13.418 → 00:38:21.958 I think it is very clearly both, because God calls David a man after his own heart, and then he calls him a man of blood. 00:38:21.958 → 00:38:26.458 So I don’t think that those are incompatible. 00:38:26.458 → 00:38:31.518 It is possible to be the sort of man David was, a warrior who killed many thousands. 00:38:31.518 → 00:38:38.098 We have no idea how many, quite frankly, but many thousands of men himself, and then many more with his armies. 00:38:39.118 → 00:38:42.238 And God calls him a man after his own heart. 00:38:42.238 → 00:38:49.918 And don’t forget, of course, this is the same God who told them to go in and wipe out the Canaanites, including men, women, children, and animals. 00:38:49.918 → 00:38:54.498 So God is not against hatred. 00:38:54.498 → 00:38:58.098 God doesn’t think that hatred is wrongful. 00:38:58.098 → 00:38:58.798 Because it’s not. 00:38:58.798 → 00:39:05.778 If you don’t hate that which is seeking to destroy the good, then you don’t truly love the good. 00:39:06.578 → 00:39:13.278 You cannot love without hate, because you must hate that which would destroy that which you love. 00:39:13.278 → 00:39:18.838 So hatred is a necessary component of love in a fallen world. 00:39:18.838 → 00:39:30.338 Now, in perfection, in paradise, when there’s no longer anything seeking to destroy, hatred, at least for us, God still has to deal with hell, but hatred for us is no longer a thing. 00:39:30.338 → 00:39:32.438 It’s no longer some part of our life. 00:39:32.438 → 00:39:37.258 It’s no longer necessary, because there’s no longer any threat to the things we love. 00:39:41.538 → 00:39:43.778 Woe mentioned having doubts about the Great Isaiah Scroll. 00:39:43.778 → 00:39:47.018 Are you able to elaborate on those doubts about its authenticity? 00:39:47.018 → 00:39:54.738 I will probably save that one for later, but it’s sort of similar to the Gerberle’s diary question. 00:39:54.738 → 00:39:57.258 It’s a question of chain of custody. 00:39:57.258 → 00:40:00.258 And do you trust the people who had it in custody? 00:40:00.258 → 00:40:04.838 And the answer is no, because I don’t trust godless communists. 00:40:04.838 → 00:40:09.078 For the same reason, I don’t trust Jews, because they’re the same group. 00:40:12.018 → 00:40:15.178 Do you believe that there is still Old Testament prophecy yet to be fulfilled? 00:40:15.178 → 00:40:23.638 Well, we certainly have the apocalyptic visions of Daniel, and so the eschaton is still out there somewhere in the future. 00:40:23.638 → 00:40:24.578 We don’t know how far. 00:40:24.578 → 00:40:25.878 Scripture is very clear about that. 00:40:25.878 → 00:40:33.378 No one knows when it’s coming, so don’t believe any man who tells you, oh, I know, because he’s lying, or he’s insane. 00:40:36.958 → 00:40:42.038 So that one’s sort of easy to say that, yes, there are things in the Old Testament that have not come to pass yet. 00:40:42.038 → 00:40:50.278 The overwhelming majority of the prophecies were fulfilled in Christ, of course, but are there things that have not been fulfilled? 00:40:50.278 → 00:40:52.158 Yes, I think so. 00:40:52.158 → 00:40:54.038 Does Woe have any plans for a podcast? 00:40:54.038 → 00:40:57.178 The answer to that is definitely no, he does not. 00:40:57.178 → 00:40:59.118 He has no plans for that. 00:40:59.218 → 00:41:04.418 I’m sure he may do an appearance here or there, but that’s not really his desire at this point. 00:41:11.648 → 00:41:13.728 What do you think of Vladimir Putin? 00:41:13.728 → 00:41:16.368 I think Vladimir Putin is KJB. 00:41:18.188 → 00:41:21.448 And not just KJB, but Berlinov is KJB. 00:41:21.448 → 00:41:24.548 So he’s not a good man. 00:41:24.548 → 00:41:28.928 Is he doing some things that are good? 00:41:28.928 → 00:41:30.468 In some cases, sure. 00:41:30.468 → 00:41:33.368 But wicked men sometimes do good things. 00:41:33.368 → 00:41:35.748 I hope that he becomes an actual Christian. 00:41:35.748 → 00:41:38.028 I, quite frankly, I really don’t think that he is. 00:41:38.908 → 00:41:42.688 I think that there’s very little evidence of that. 00:41:42.688 → 00:41:48.128 But I also am not particularly familiar with his statements on religion. 00:41:48.128 → 00:41:53.568 I only know a little bit about it, so I’m not willing to conclude, you know, conclusively one way or the other. 00:41:53.568 → 00:41:57.748 But I do not find him to be a good man for the reasons stated. 00:41:57.748 → 00:42:06.248 Because someone who works in the KJB, particularly the Berlinov is, is not going to be someone I would certainly trust with anything. 00:42:06.248 → 00:42:07.468 I don’t think I trust that kind of person. 00:42:07.548 → 00:42:10.168 Maybe I trust him by wallet just because it’s trivial, he wouldn’t steal that. 00:42:10.168 → 00:42:14.168 But not the kind of man I’m going to hold in high regard. 00:42:14.168 → 00:42:18.668 And there’s also the fact that he leads a nation that is essentially apostate. 00:42:19.828 → 00:42:33.848 I know that in the West, in certain subgroups anyway, Russia has this reputation as being a great defender of the Christian faith, the Christian religion, of all these things, blah, blah, blah. 00:42:33.848 → 00:42:35.468 The problem is the Russians don’t even attend church. 00:42:37.188 → 00:42:39.748 They barely go on Christmas and Easter. 00:42:39.748 → 00:42:54.128 And abortion, granted, I will point out, and this is something that you just definitely do when it happens, their numbers are improving, but the abortion numbers from Eastern Europe, particularly from Russia, are abhorrent. 00:42:54.128 → 00:42:57.308 Russia was the worst example for many years. 00:42:57.308 → 00:43:04.708 And so I don’t see the actual Christianity playing out in Russia that is claimed to exist there. 00:43:06.148 → 00:43:11.508 And to some degree, a leader is a reflection of the nation, and the nation is a reflection of the leader. 00:43:11.508 → 00:43:15.928 And so, when I look at the nation, I don’t see good things. 00:43:15.928 → 00:43:19.428 When I look at the leader, I don’t see good things. 00:43:19.428 → 00:43:32.768 And of course, you have the problem of still kind of glorifying the Soviet era and the communists and all the evils they did, because there’s a very real problem with regard to Russia and getting over that and recognizing that what was done in that era was evil. 00:43:33.768 → 00:43:36.328 But this sort of gets off into the political weeds. 00:43:36.328 → 00:43:47.168 Obviously, that starts to cause problems with how they have propped up their government as legitimate over previous decades, and so that gets into a big mess. 00:43:47.168 → 00:43:51.468 But that’s my short version of what I think about Vladimir Putin. 00:43:51.468 → 00:43:58.708 There’s also the fact that he’s very old at this point for a politician, particularly one in such a stressful position. 00:43:58.708 → 00:44:04.488 He’ll probably be retiring at some point in the not too distant future, and so he won’t be relevant forever. 00:44:04.488 → 00:44:09.548 He’s just been relevant for a large part of certainly my life, and undoubtedly for many of you listening. 00:44:09.548 → 00:44:15.968 So I think that sort of covers my views on that subject anyway. 00:44:18.268 → 00:44:24.568 So I think I’ll do maybe one or two more questions, since I think we’re right about at the hour mark here, if I’m not mistaken. 00:44:24.568 → 00:44:27.408 Let me look up the actual recording here. 00:44:27.408 → 00:44:33.868 I guess we’re only at about the 45, 50 minute mark, not counting the countdown, which it’s not fair to include the countdown. 00:44:33.868 → 00:44:37.008 So, can you discuss swearing? 00:44:37.008 → 00:44:40.068 What words are swearing and who defines it? 00:44:40.068 → 00:44:49.828 I think this is similar to the, that’s just as Potter Stewart, I didn’t mention his name last time, but I think it’s similar to the pornography question. 00:44:49.828 → 00:44:52.648 You know when you see it and hopefully you don’t see it. 00:44:52.648 → 00:45:01.828 With regard to swearing, however, I’m not saying that it’s equivalent morally to pornography, because I don’t think that it is something you should never do. 00:45:01.828 → 00:45:03.608 You should never look at pornography. 00:45:03.608 → 00:45:07.388 Pornography shouldn’t exist, it should all be destroyed, it should be a capital crime. 00:45:07.388 → 00:45:11.148 But swearing is a time and a place. 00:45:11.148 → 00:45:12.948 We have those words for a reason. 00:45:12.948 → 00:45:22.328 That’s not to say that everything that exists has a reason, because certainly there are combinations of words that should never be spoken, ones that amount to blasphemy, for instance. 00:45:22.328 → 00:45:29.088 So the tendency of English speakers and some others to use Jesus as a swear word, as an expletive. 00:45:29.088 → 00:45:31.408 You should not do that ever, period. 00:45:31.408 → 00:45:33.988 That should be a never thing. 00:45:33.988 → 00:45:44.428 But with regard to other words that we consider to be swear words, and I’m not going to use them for obvious reasons, partly because I do think that you should not use them on women and children. 00:45:44.428 → 00:45:49.708 And women and children may very well see this, so it would be inappropriate. 00:45:49.708 → 00:45:57.328 But can you, particularly talking to men among other men in certain circumstances use expletives? 00:45:57.328 → 00:46:05.348 The answer is yes, and I think that they have a time and a place, and I think they are right to use in certain times under certain conditions. 00:46:05.348 → 00:46:13.288 I think that any ex-military listening or active military listening are certainly going to agree with me on that one. 00:46:13.288 → 00:46:16.128 So who defines what they are? 00:46:16.128 → 00:46:17.888 That’s a cultural matter. 00:46:17.888 → 00:46:20.208 These things are a natural outgrowth of the culture. 00:46:20.208 → 00:46:22.428 They develop over time in the same way that language develops. 00:46:23.268 → 00:46:32.248 And so a word that is totally innocuous 500 years ago may be an expletive today, or vice versa. 00:46:32.248 → 00:46:38.328 Or cross-language, of course, because I won’t say it, because it’s going to sound bad to English ears. 00:46:38.328 → 00:46:46.628 But the Latin verb for to do sounds like an English swear word, but it’s not in that context. 00:46:46.628 → 00:46:57.768 And so, yes, these things are context specific, but I know some people who get into, you know, chompsky or something else like that, they start to think weird things, they have odd thoughts about, well, is it a swear word? 00:46:57.768 → 00:47:02.048 Because it’s not actually bad inherently, it’s according to context. 00:47:02.048 → 00:47:04.688 Well, of course, it’s according to context. 00:47:04.688 → 00:47:07.648 Almost everything in life is according to context. 00:47:07.648 → 00:47:21.208 So, you know, if I toss water on you, just a glass of water on you, in the middle of, you know, a meeting, that’s different from if I throw a water balloon at you during the summer out running around, right? 00:47:21.328 → 00:47:23.988 Or at a water park. 00:47:23.988 → 00:47:25.048 Does the context matter? 00:47:25.048 → 00:47:27.008 Yes, the context matter for the act. 00:47:27.008 → 00:47:30.248 Context also matters for the words being said. 00:47:30.248 → 00:47:34.888 There are things that are not appropriate in some places that are appropriate in others. 00:47:34.888 → 00:47:42.708 And so, you know, there are things that you can say to your wife that you probably shouldn’t say to people you pass in the street and vice versa. 00:47:42.708 → 00:47:47.708 So just because things are context dependent does not mean that they aren’t real. 00:47:49.128 → 00:47:55.928 So that whole argument when you get in to semiotics and stuff like that, complete nonsense. 00:47:55.928 → 00:48:05.228 It’s not that the word in itself, the set of sounds, is essentially bad, is in and of itself bad. 00:48:05.228 → 00:48:10.228 It’s that in the context of the language you are speaking, it has a certain meaning. 00:48:10.228 → 00:48:16.348 And that meaning is one that should not be spoken in certain company, but may be spoken in other company. 00:48:17.148 → 00:48:23.408 And so, that’s basically my view of the use of expletives and swear words and things like that. 00:48:23.408 → 00:48:38.608 I don’t think that they’re per se wrongful, but I think that they should be used sparingly, partly because they don’t have any power, unless they’re used sparingly, but also because it’s inappropriate to use them in certain places at certain times. 00:48:41.808 → 00:48:45.828 Which SC episodes were your favorite to actually record? 00:48:47.428 → 00:48:52.008 I don’t really know which were my favorite to record. 00:48:53.228 → 00:49:00.908 They were all kind of similar, except for some were much less fun than others. 00:49:00.908 → 00:49:07.368 So topics that are very serious, very weighty, are going to be a little less fun as it were to record. 00:49:07.368 → 00:49:18.068 I’m not even sure fun is really necessarily the right description here, but those are going to be a little less fun just because you have to take those more seriously. 00:49:18.068 → 00:49:19.708 It’s a heavier subject. 00:49:19.708 → 00:49:24.768 When you deal with heavy subjects, they take a certain sort of toll. 00:49:24.768 → 00:49:39.468 I’m not going to say that it took years off my life or something like that, but I would think sort of the analogy would be certain areas of law are harder to practice because of the subject matter. 00:49:39.468 → 00:49:43.488 And I am thinking specifically of the sex crimes unit in the DA’s office. 00:49:44.128 → 00:50:00.688 I know some people who have done that as their career choice, and it takes a toll on you unless you’re the kind of person who can really sort of partition your life and sort of tune those things out when you’re no longer at work, but very few men can do that. 00:50:00.688 → 00:50:06.188 So certain subjects are going to be more difficult just because they are weightier, they are more important. 00:50:06.188 → 00:50:20.068 So I don’t know if I would say that there’s anyone that was like particularly fun to record, but it’s not that I didn’t like recording Stone Choir, of course, but I don’t know that I’d have like a top 10 most fun to record episodes. 00:50:24.048 → 00:50:27.168 Why do you think God permits the Jews to continue existing? 00:50:27.168 → 00:50:33.508 Their sin is not yet complete, end quotes, worries me for the fate of all people, but makes me wonder how sinful the Jews can get. 00:50:35.948 → 00:50:48.828 This is perhaps a difficult question, and one that I can’t necessarily answer fully in this place at this time, but part of it is judgment. 00:50:48.828 → 00:51:24.328 If God permits a people to go on sinning, to fill up their cup of wrath, as he did with the Canaanites, as he did with many other groups, we see that in pages of scripture and the pages of history, it is a form of judgment, because actually the greatest mercy God could have on you, if you were never going to convert, like you are the sort of person who is just going to adamantly, persistently, defiantly walk contrary to God your entire life, and you were going to waltz straight into hell, the kindest thing God could do would be to kill you in the womb. 00:51:25.648 → 00:51:44.088 But God doesn’t do that, because God permits us to live at our lives, to exercise our free will, and in some cases, that is defiantly not a good thing, because some people use their free will to make their eternity much, much worse, and that is essentially what the Jews are doing. 00:51:44.088 → 00:51:49.008 They are making their eternity worse every time they do something evil. 00:51:49.008 → 00:51:53.528 And that is very unfortunate, for them and for everyone else, of course. 00:51:53.528 → 00:51:59.068 But that is the reality of it, and it also falls to good men to stop evil men. 00:51:59.848 → 00:52:12.668 And so one of the reasons, possibly one of the most important reasons, when you can say that evil men continue to exist and continue to do evil things in the world, it is because good men have failed to remove them. 00:52:12.668 → 00:52:22.688 That is one of the reasons that we had capital punishment for centuries in Europe, and we basically just got rid of all of the men who were inclined toward criminality. 00:52:22.688 → 00:52:28.188 And that’s one of the reasons that European countries had such a very low crime rate prior to so-called immigration. 00:52:29.188 → 00:52:37.228 It is incumbent on good men, particularly the Christian prince, to whom is entrusted the sort of state to remove evil men from society. 00:52:37.228 → 00:52:44.768 And when that does not happen, their evil continues to compound and grow over a course of centuries. 00:52:44.768 → 00:52:47.308 And that is exactly what we see happening with the Jews. 00:52:51.188 → 00:52:58.208 Do you foresee a rise in right-wing paganism or Nietzscheanism in the future, or do you think it’s more of an internet larp or fad? 00:52:58.208 → 00:53:01.408 It’s a larp, to be completely blunt and honest. 00:53:01.408 → 00:53:08.928 And the men who are in that, who listen to me, and I know there may be some in the chat very well, but I’ve said that to their faces, they know what I think. 00:53:08.928 → 00:53:11.228 So that’s nothing new for them. 00:53:11.228 → 00:53:12.848 I’m not going to sugarcoat it. 00:53:12.848 → 00:53:23.508 And it is sort of ironic that some of them will hold up the national socialists and try to tie them into paganism when Adolf Hitler is literally the source of calling them a larp. 00:53:24.668 → 00:53:36.228 That he’s actually literally the source of that anti-meme, as it were, or meme, whichever way you want to call it, of calling them just a weird, nonsensical, unserious larp. 00:53:36.228 → 00:53:38.688 That’s not to say that I don’t recognize why they do it. 00:53:38.688 → 00:53:41.368 And I’ve gone into this before, but I’ll go into it again. 00:53:41.368 → 00:53:46.068 I recognize why they have the interest in those things. 00:53:46.068 → 00:53:47.948 Why they have a distaste for the church. 00:53:47.948 → 00:53:49.508 Because the church is currently weak. 00:53:51.108 → 00:54:02.508 The church is currently infested with weak men, with effeminate men, with men who are not Christians, and yet they’re wearing the trappings of Christians and pretending to be Christians. 00:54:02.508 → 00:54:15.508 And so when the church looks weak, it is going to drive away men who are disgusted rightfully by weakness, by that sort of just spinelessness that you see rampant in the churches. 00:54:15.508 → 00:54:20.148 And so they’re looking for something that is powerful, something that is strong. 00:54:20.148 → 00:54:37.228 And there’s nothing wrong with that, because as I remind people all the time, God’s power, God’s position of authority, rests on his power, on his strength, on his ability to inflict infinite torture on all of his enemies. 00:54:37.228 → 00:54:43.168 And so it’s completely ridiculous to think that being strong is not part of Christianity. 00:54:43.168 → 00:54:45.368 That’s what God has designed men to be. 00:54:46.028 → 00:54:51.428 And so, men who are weak are actually condemned in the pages of scripture. 00:54:51.428 → 00:55:01.768 Because if feminacy is condemned, and it’s not just in the sexual context, if feminacy is condemned with regard to men, I want to be clear, I’m not saying with regard to women, because of course it’s praised for women. 00:55:01.768 → 00:55:05.448 But for men, it is a deep and abiding wickedness. 00:55:05.448 → 00:55:19.648 And so, when you have these men who recognize the evils that are taking place in the church and want to escape that evil, they’re doing it the wrong way, but I understand why they’re doing it. 00:55:19.648 → 00:55:22.128 And the impulse is not wrong. 00:55:22.128 → 00:55:25.888 They are drawing the wrong conclusion from the evidence. 00:55:29.548 → 00:55:32.628 But no, I don’t think it’s going to be a serious long-term force. 00:55:32.628 → 00:55:57.628 I think that as Christianity turns and becomes Christianity again, those men are going to come back to the churches, and we will welcome them back to the churches, because, sure, they went on a detour for a while, and I think that it was foolish, and I think that it was wrong, but they are my brothers, and I want them back in the churches, because that is one of my overriding goals, is to get white men back into the churches. 00:56:11.292 → 00:56:16.172 Do you think that there is an opportunity for a new far right-wing party in the United States? 00:56:17.632 → 00:56:24.532 That one is somewhat difficult to answer because there are a lot of moving parts there. 00:56:24.532 → 00:56:32.272 But I think the first thing that I would say about it is sort of political science answer. 00:56:32.272 → 00:56:36.192 The US does not have what is called party discipline. 00:56:37.632 → 00:56:39.992 We could contrast this perhaps with Great Britain. 00:56:40.792 → 00:56:48.532 The way that party discipline works in the UK context is that they have lists for politicians. 00:56:48.532 → 00:56:55.612 And when they reach a certain level of votes, depending on where you are on the list, you may get an office. 00:56:55.612 → 00:56:58.692 Now, I’m simplifying a little bit, but this is basically how it works. 00:56:58.692 → 00:57:06.812 And so part of how they have party discipline, which I’ll define that briefly so people know what I’m talking about before I keep talking about something that makes no sense. 00:57:07.352 → 00:57:19.912 Party discipline is the ability of the party authorities to get the party members, in this case politicians, not individual voters, to follow the party line, to do what they want, to follow orders. 00:57:19.912 → 00:57:23.992 So how they do that is they determine your place in the list. 00:57:23.992 → 00:57:29.372 If you don’t follow orders, you get bumped down the list, and then you probably don’t get elected. 00:57:29.372 → 00:57:32.272 Very easy for them, very good party discipline. 00:57:32.272 → 00:57:35.792 The party higher-ups can tell you what to do, and you either play ball or you get kicked out. 00:57:37.132 → 00:57:49.332 We don’t really have that in the US context, because the central parties, so the GOP and the DNC, don’t actually have enforcement mechanisms except money. 00:57:49.332 → 00:57:58.712 And so if you can raise money in a grassroots fashion, if you can raise it through many small donations, you are not ultimately beholden to the national party. 00:57:58.712 → 00:58:06.392 All they can do is, you know, maybe censure you or publish a mean media piece about you, whatever it is, a hit piece. 00:58:06.392 → 00:58:14.312 They can’t actually tell you what to do, because we don’t have the enforcement mechanisms because of the way our system is built. 00:58:14.312 → 00:58:30.292 Now, if you get to the national system, it’s a little different because they can shut you out of, say, committees and things in Congress, and they can very much limit your authority or your ability to exercise your authority at least. 00:58:30.292 → 00:58:38.752 But at the state level, and particularly at, say, the city level or the county level, the national parties don’t have that much power. 00:58:38.752 → 00:58:46.192 So can you run as a Republican in a county and actually attain office and have some autonomy and do something good? 00:58:46.192 → 00:58:47.672 Absolutely. 00:58:47.672 → 00:59:01.332 So if that stuff starts happening, then there is a chance at least particularly develop a regional power base for our people and for the actual right wing, not the establishment, the kosher right wing. 00:59:02.472 → 00:59:12.772 But if you could do that in a regional area, then sure, you can be the Republican party, but are you really the Republican party? 00:59:12.772 → 00:59:14.832 The answer is yes and no. 00:59:14.832 → 00:59:19.632 No in the sense that you’re not obeying the party leadership, but yes in the sense that who cares what they say. 00:59:19.632 → 00:59:22.932 They don’t have an enforcement mechanism to force you to do it. 00:59:22.932 → 00:59:30.012 The alternative is, of course, starting up a new party, which is somewhat difficult, and you wind up doing the same thing. 00:59:31.212 → 00:59:39.652 And the reason you wind up doing the same thing is because in the US., if you were to start up a new party, it would not initially at least be a national undertaking. 00:59:39.652 → 00:59:48.112 It would inherently just by the nature of our system be regional, particularly focused in some state, I would say, is probably best. 00:59:48.112 → 00:59:54.032 I’m personally going to say Tennessee, partly because I live here, partly because that’s just where I see things going. 00:59:54.032 → 01:00:02.652 Tennessee seems to be a nexus for whatever reason, a couple dozen different reasons, but topic for another time, perhaps. 01:00:02.652 → 01:00:10.232 If you have that national goal in mind, then you can start with a regional buildup. 01:00:10.232 → 01:00:27.032 And so, you know, if you start in East Tennessee, and then you associate with middle and West Tennessee, and then Kentucky, right, and then the rest of the deep south, and you build up a network in that sort of way, you can absolutely do that with a new party. 01:00:28.052 → 01:00:32.872 Do I think that a new party is optimal or necessary? 01:00:34.272 → 01:00:42.132 I think that it’s probably more likely that is the route than taking over the Republican Party. 01:00:42.132 → 01:00:48.232 So, maybe 60-40, if I were to assign numbers to it, percentages, likelihoods. 01:00:48.232 → 01:01:02.092 So not 100%, but certainly more likely than the alternative, just because the structure of the Republican Party is going to shut you out of funding, and certainly out of committees and things, if you happen to get someone into the national government. 01:01:02.092 → 01:01:05.252 And so, that’s an additional hurdle to overcome. 01:01:05.252 → 01:01:07.792 But at the same time, they’re going to do the same thing. 01:01:07.792 → 01:01:16.632 If you send someone to Washington, DC., as a representative who’s part of the nationalist party, or whatever you happen to call your party. 01:01:16.632 → 01:01:19.592 Those are very real hurdles you have to overcome. 01:01:19.592 → 01:01:23.712 The way forward for the right, ultimately, and I’m not revealing anything great here. 01:01:24.152 → 01:01:27.492 Plenty of men can recognize this is going to happen. 01:01:27.492 → 01:01:45.692 You need to have a number of leaders who are gifted at speaking, who are able to cogently, coherently broadcast our points, our talking points, our position to the masses, and get those men to come on board. 01:01:45.692 → 01:01:51.472 And it shouldn’t be that hard, in some cases, because we are the ones who actually want what is best for them. 01:01:51.472 → 01:01:55.072 We are the ones who have policies that will actually benefit them. 01:01:55.072 → 01:02:02.712 The average American would have a far better life if so-called far-right men were in charge running the country. 01:02:02.712 → 01:02:07.152 But it’s a matter of getting them to recognize that. 01:02:07.152 → 01:02:17.472 And the thing is, I don’t think that it’s going to be that difficult in many cases, because I’ve been putting up feelers, as it were, in looking at politics and how things are on the ground. 01:02:18.912 → 01:02:27.492 Men, who you would not expect, are very willing to hear our talking points these days, even among the baby boomer generation. 01:02:27.492 → 01:02:30.152 So things are definitely shifting. 01:02:30.152 → 01:02:38.552 So I guess that’s sort of a meandering answer to your question, but it’s sort of a nebulous question, and a necessarily nebulous answer for that. 01:02:42.772 → 01:02:46.092 Why did you only make X episodes of your Tish Raiden podcast? 01:02:46.092 → 01:02:49.772 I really enjoyed those, and it sounded like you were going to make more. 01:02:49.772 → 01:02:58.052 I guess I can actually just go ahead and share, because I think people will probably find it funny, and I am not legally bound not to share it. 01:02:58.052 → 01:03:01.572 I got banned from that brewery for that podcast. 01:03:01.572 → 01:03:08.412 So recording that podcast in particular cost me the ability to go to a brewery that I actually like. 01:03:08.412 → 01:03:13.252 I do not call and harass them, do not pester them about that. 01:03:13.252 → 01:03:18.852 I know why they did it, I understand why they did it, they weren’t mean about it. 01:03:18.852 → 01:03:25.092 So I 100% understand their position and why they did what they did. 01:03:25.092 → 01:03:26.792 So do not harass them, don’t pester them. 01:03:26.792 → 01:03:28.732 I don’t hold it against them. 01:03:29.812 → 01:03:36.832 They were being harassed by Antifa and others and having nasty messages, and I don’t even know the nature of the voicemails of things that were being left. 01:03:36.832 → 01:03:40.172 But that sort of thing was happening. 01:03:40.172 → 01:03:42.372 Am I against recording something like that in the future? 01:03:42.372 → 01:03:43.732 I would say no. 01:03:43.732 → 01:03:55.432 I might take a few more measures to sort of disambiguate things, or at least to sort of attenuate the connection between me and whatever place happens to be hosting it. 01:03:55.432 → 01:04:08.992 I don’t object to doing that, but I don’t necessarily see doing that in the immediate future, because that would require me to find some people who are also willing to do that, who are public with their views as well. 01:04:08.992 → 01:04:11.592 And there are some of those, so maybe that’s something for the future. 01:04:11.592 → 01:04:18.252 But yes, the reason that I stopped doing that is quite literally because we got banned from that location. 01:04:18.252 → 01:04:21.072 So it happens. 01:04:21.072 → 01:04:25.032 That’s part of being a dissident movement, as it were. 01:04:25.032 → 01:04:30.792 And if you are very public with your views, you’re going to sort of pay for them every so often in some ways. 01:04:37.083 → 01:04:48.963 I am going to leave this question about book recommendations for understanding the modern West until next time, because I do have some of those in mind, but I want to think about that question a little bit, so I will wait until next time. 01:04:53.403 → 01:04:59.903 And I think I will also leave the question about the Tetragrammaton, because I have a short answer to that, but I think I’d want to expand on that a little bit. 01:04:59.903 → 01:05:11.943 So I think I will call it here for this week, since I think we’re just over an hour of actual Q&A now, not counting that countdown, which again shouldn’t be counted. 01:05:13.003 → 01:05:14.363 So thank you all for your time. 01:05:14.363 → 01:05:16.943 Thank you for those who submitted questions. 01:05:16.943 → 01:05:21.523 Again, if you would like to submit questions, there is a link in the description. 01:05:21.523 → 01:05:30.723 I will also be posting that in my Telegram channel, but it is just [omnifora.com](http://omnifora.com), and it is the request category. 01:05:30.723 → 01:05:31.783 Please put it in that category. 01:05:31.783 → 01:05:32.803 If you don’t, I can move it. 01:05:32.863 → 01:05:36.903 It’s not a big deal, it just saves me 10 seconds. 01:05:36.903 → 01:05:43.563 But if you submit a question there, just submit the question, and then you can vote on other ones that are there. 01:05:43.563 → 01:05:48.383 Currently, I’ve answered basically all of the ones that are there, so there’s no need to vote on them right now. 01:05:48.383 → 01:05:56.003 But if you vote on them, then as they rise to the top, say if there are a lot of questions in the future, I can prioritize them, that will help me. 01:05:56.003 → 01:06:07.203 And like I’ve said before, the reason I do that is because I’m creating a library, and then I can point people, and other men can also point other men to my answers, so they can find them more easily. 01:06:07.203 → 01:06:11.783 Instead of sort of the ephemera that is social media, this is something that has a little more staying power. 01:06:11.783 → 01:06:20.983 And unlike other platforms, I actually have control over it, so I don’t have to worry about someone deleting all of my content or shutting me down, or what have you. 01:06:20.983 → 01:06:26.943 Like, you know, YouTube, as it were, could, tomorrow, delete all my videos and give me no recourse. 01:06:26.943 → 01:06:29.283 With this, I don’t have that problem. 01:06:29.283 → 01:06:34.183 I still have all the local recordings, so I could theoretically make them all available that way. 01:06:34.183 → 01:06:37.663 It’s a lot of bandwidth, but if necessary, I would do that in the future. 01:06:37.663 → 01:06:40.823 So that’s how you submit questions. 01:06:40.823 → 01:06:42.123 I will get to them as I can. 01:06:42.123 → 01:06:47.463 I’ll write down the couple of questions I see here in the chat so that I do have those for next time. 01:06:47.463 → 01:06:56.543 But again, thank you for your time, and I hope that I answered the questions satisfactorily for those of you whose questions I actually answered this time. 01:06:56.543 → 01:06:58.443 And I will see you next week. 01:06:59.083 → 01:07:00.563 God bless you all, have a nice evening.