Episode Information
- Date: 2026-01(Jan)-01(Thu)
- Links:
- Episode:
- Transcript:
- Other Platforms:
- Video:
- YouTube: https://youtube.com/live/5r8GOnqTzyE
- X:
- Twitch:
- Kick:
- Rumble:
- Video:
- Original Broadcasts
YouTube
Episode Wiki
This is the episode wiki — trusted users can edit it.
Topics Covered
- How should Ezekiel chapters 37-39 be properly exegeted, especially regarding “Israel”?
- Anglican vs Lutheran (new town)
- Baptism Theology
- What is the role of the Christian prince in establishing or enforcing a state religion/denomination?
- What is your opinion on the increasing allowance of criticism of Israel/Jews on platforms, without life-ruining consequences, but without discussing race or solutions?
- Marital Fantasies
- Two Natures in Christ
Topic Timestamps
0:00:00- Ezekiel Exegesis
0:19:32- Denominational Affiliation
0:23:19- Baptism Theology
0:33:53- Home Worship
0:36:34- Marital Fantasies
0:46:59- Christʼs Nature
Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:00.380 → 00:00:03.260
It is the 1st of January, 2026.
00:00:03.260 → 00:00:04.220
I am Corey J.
00:00:04.220 → 00:00:06.140
Mahler, and this is At Any Cost.
00:00:06.140 → 00:00:09.340
This is a question and answer episode.
00:00:09.340 → 00:00:14.520
And happy new year to all of you, and I think I will just get straight into the questions here.
00:00:14.520 → 00:00:26.840
Unfortunately, ReStream is seemingly having some kind of problem with their OBS plug-in, so I have to check the comments in another window because it’s not loading, having some cross origin issue.
00:00:27.740 → 00:00:30.360
So, hopefully, they fix that by next week.
00:00:30.360 → 00:00:34.120
At any rate, moving right into the questions.
00:00:34.120 → 00:00:37.400
The first question is an exegetical one.
00:00:37.400 → 00:00:38.980
It is a little bit longer.
00:00:40.120 → 00:00:47.660
I may go through the fullness of the text just because it’s a useful text to go through for a number of reasons.
00:00:47.660 → 00:01:02.960
But the question is about Ezekiel 37 through 39, so obviously, not trivial, but not that substantial chunk of scripture, and how that plays into proper exegesis.
00:01:02.960 → 00:01:24.000
So understanding what Israel is, what Israel isn’t, and particularly how to respond to those who interpret that incorrectly and believe that it is dealing exclusively or even primarily with ethnic Israel, which is to say Old Testament Israel, the Jews in that sense.
00:01:24.060 → 00:01:27.020
So more properly, the Hebrews and the Jews.
00:01:27.020 → 00:01:33.540
But let me pull up Logos here so that we can get the scripture visible.
00:01:36.740 → 00:01:45.660
Actually, I think I would just pull up the full Logos window for this one, because I’m going to want both the Old Testament and the New Testament, and you don’t really need to see my face while I’m reading.
00:01:45.660 → 00:01:47.760
It’s not that important.
00:01:47.760 → 00:02:17.360
So looking at Ezekiel, I think I probably will go through the fullness of this, just because it’s going to come up again and again and again, and not just this, but similar sections of the Old Testament, because those who have been misinformed, have been falsely taught with regard to what Israel is and what Israel is not, are going to resort to passages like this in order to, well, try to defend false theology.
00:02:18.600 → 00:02:23.040
So, let’s just go through the fullness of it.
00:02:23.040 → 00:02:24.900
Starting with 37, we’ll read through 39.
00:02:24.900 → 00:02:29.320
I’ll probably comment along the way instead of waiting to the end, just because I think that’s useful here.
00:02:29.320 → 00:02:40.700
Eventually I will go through and do something more substantial on this and similar passages, but this is sort of the Cliff Notes version of it, the short version of it.
00:02:40.700 → 00:02:46.020
And the hand of the Lord came upon me, and the Lord brought me out in his spirit, and set me in the midst of the plain.
00:02:46.720 → 00:02:49.000
And this was full of human bones.
00:02:49.000 → 00:02:55.960
And he brought me all around them in a circle, and behold, very many, very dry, upon the surface of the plain.
00:02:55.960 → 00:02:59.660
And he said to me, Son of man, shall these bones live?
00:02:59.660 → 00:03:02.860
And I said, O Lord, you know these things.
00:03:02.860 → 00:03:10.760
And he said to me, Prophesy over these bones, and you shall say to them, O dry bones, hear a word of the Lord.
00:03:10.760 → 00:03:12.980
This is what the Lord says to these bones.
00:03:13.720 → 00:03:27.240
Behold, I am bringing into you a spirit of life, and I will give sinews on you, and bring flesh upon you, and draw out skin over you, and give my breath into you, and you shall live, and you shall know that I am the Lord.
00:03:28.360 → 00:03:37.640
And I prophesied as he commanded me, and it happened when I prophesied, and behold a shaking, and he brought forth the bones, each to its joint.
00:03:37.640 → 00:03:46.100
And I looked, and behold, sinews and flesh were growing upon them, and skin was coming up upon them, on top, but no breath was in them.
00:03:46.100 → 00:03:59.760
And he said to me, prophesy to the breath, prophesy, son of man, and say to the breath, this is what the Lord says, come from the four winds, and blow into these corpses, and they shall live.
00:03:59.760 → 00:04:08.500
And I prophesied just as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived and stood upon their feet, a very great gathering.
00:04:08.500 → 00:04:14.360
And the Lord spoke to me, saying, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel.
00:04:14.360 → 00:04:20.060
And they say, our bones have become dry, our hope is perished, we are lost.
00:04:20.060 → 00:04:30.800
Therefore prophesy and say, this is what the Lord says, behold I am opening your tombs, and will bring you up out of your tombs, and bring you into the land of Israel.
00:04:30.800 → 00:04:37.120
And you shall know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves, so that I might bring my people up out of their graves.
00:04:37.860 → 00:04:49.420
And I will give my spirit into you, and you shall live, and I will place you upon your own land, and you shall know that I, the Lord, have spoken, and I will act, says the Lord.
00:04:50.760 → 00:05:01.040
And so here we have basically one of the first things that they are going to bring up when they’re trying to tell you, no, it’s promises for ethnic Israel, it’s not promises for Christians.
00:05:01.040 → 00:05:03.460
They’re going to bring up that it mentions the house of Israel.
00:05:04.720 → 00:05:12.800
But in order to understand these passages in the Old Testament, you have to understand what is meant by Israel.
00:05:12.800 → 00:05:28.080
And this is the fundamental problem that you have with so many when it comes to exegesis of these passages, because they’ve been inculcated with this false belief from dispensationalism and related things.
00:05:28.080 → 00:05:29.440
That’s the problem.
00:05:29.440 → 00:05:35.560
And so the issue here is that Israel is the church.
00:05:35.560 → 00:05:40.240
I’m just going to go right up front and say that bluntly, Israel is the church.
00:05:40.240 → 00:05:46.660
I guess I should pull it up in this other Logos window as well, so we’re not looking at the preface to Emperor Charles here.
00:05:47.720 → 00:05:50.320
But Israel is the church.
00:05:50.320 → 00:05:56.980
And one of the ways you can understand this, of course, is when dealing with the promises, what does it speak of?
00:05:56.980 → 00:06:05.060
And particularly, you should look at the New Testament, because we use the New Testament, which has a clarity to the Old Testament does not, when interpreting the Old Testament.
00:06:05.060 → 00:06:09.940
And so, for instance, we can turn to Galatians 3.21, is a good place to start.
00:06:09.940 → 00:06:11.820
And I will pull that up here.
00:06:15.560 → 00:06:23.880
So, starting with Galatians 3, verse 21, Is the law then contrary to the promises of God?
00:06:23.940 → 00:06:30.460
Certainly not, for if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.
00:06:30.460 → 00:06:38.080
But the scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.
00:06:38.080 → 00:06:44.700
Now, before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed.
00:06:44.700 → 00:06:50.660
So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith.
00:06:50.660 → 00:06:54.080
But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
00:06:54.080 → 00:06:58.060
For in Christ Jesus, you are all sons of God, through faith.
00:06:58.060 → 00:07:01.760
For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
00:07:01.760 → 00:07:03.380
There is neither Jew nor Greek.
00:07:03.380 → 00:07:05.200
There is neither slave nor free.
00:07:05.200 → 00:07:07.020
There is no male and female.
00:07:07.020 → 00:07:09.300
For you are all one in Christ Jesus.
00:07:09.300 → 00:07:14.480
And if you are Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.
00:07:14.480 → 00:07:18.700
And so, of course, what is the house of Israel, the actual house of Israel?
00:07:18.700 → 00:07:26.660
The heirs to Abraham, Abraham’s true offspring, his true offspring are those through the promise, not through the law.
00:07:26.660 → 00:07:29.180
You have this in a number of places in scripture.
00:07:29.180 → 00:07:31.160
It’s very clear.
00:07:31.160 → 00:07:38.500
So, for instance, we can also turn to the next chapter of Galatians, which is even more clear on this subject than perhaps Galatians 3.
00:07:38.500 → 00:07:46.520
And, of course, we’ve dealt with, in Stone Choir, Galatians 3.28 and all those issues that people bring up, so I won’t reiterate that here.
00:07:46.520 → 00:07:52.740
Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not listen to the law?
00:07:52.740 → 00:07:58.780
For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman.
00:07:58.780 → 00:08:04.600
But the son of the slave was born according to the flesh, while the son of the free woman was born through promise.
00:08:04.600 → 00:08:07.080
Now, this may be interpreted allegorically.
00:08:07.080 → 00:08:08.760
That’s an important point.
00:08:08.760 → 00:08:10.740
These women are two covenants.
00:08:10.760 → 00:08:14.420
One is from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery.
00:08:14.420 → 00:08:15.280
She is Hagar.
00:08:16.000 → 00:08:18.820
Now, Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia.
00:08:18.820 → 00:08:24.260
She corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children.
00:08:24.260 → 00:08:27.840
But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.
00:08:27.840 → 00:08:35.340
For it is written, Rejoice, O barren one who does not bear, break forth and cry aloud, you who are not in labor.
00:08:35.340 → 00:08:40.980
For the children of the desolate one will be more than those of the one who has a husband.
00:08:40.980 → 00:08:43.780
Now, you brothers like Isaac are children of promise.
00:08:44.540 → 00:08:52.960
But just as at that time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the spirit, so also it is now.
00:08:52.960 → 00:08:55.140
But what does the scripture say?
00:08:55.140 → 00:09:01.640
Cast out the slave woman and her son, for the son of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman.
00:09:01.640 → 00:09:06.260
So brothers, we are not children of the slave, but of the free woman.
00:09:06.260 → 00:09:13.440
And of course, the Jews are the children of the slave woman, because they are not children of the promise because they are not in Christ.
00:09:13.820 → 00:09:20.700
And so, they cannot be in view in these Old Testament passages that are dealing with Israel.
00:09:20.700 → 00:09:24.160
One of the ways, of course, you can see this, it’s very clear in this passage here.
00:09:24.160 → 00:09:26.100
There are two different Jerusalems.
00:09:26.100 → 00:09:39.900
This is one that is going to come up in a number of places, and you can think perhaps of Psalm 47 in the Septuagint numbering, Psalm 48 in the numbering with which we’re more familiar, because those are the Bibles we have.
00:09:41.280 → 00:09:51.340
And in that, it describes Jerusalem as being in, in the wording of the Masoretic text, the far north, or in the wording of the Septuagint text, the slopes of the north.
00:09:51.340 → 00:09:55.940
In either case, it’s talking about Jerusalem being in the north.
00:09:55.940 → 00:10:03.560
Well, if you know anything about Old Testament Israel and even Israel today, so called, where is Jerusalem located?
00:10:03.560 → 00:10:06.720
Jerusalem is located in Judah.
00:10:06.720 → 00:10:08.240
Judah is the southern kingdom.
00:10:08.240 → 00:10:09.260
Jerusalem is in the south.
00:10:09.600 → 00:10:10.960
It’s not in the north.
00:10:10.960 → 00:10:21.920
And so, very clearly, it cannot be describing earthly Jerusalem, which is also obvious by the fact that it’s described in Revelation and other places as coming down from heaven.
00:10:21.920 → 00:10:23.160
This is the heavenly Jerusalem.
00:10:23.160 → 00:10:24.340
It’s speaking about the heavenly city.
00:10:24.340 → 00:10:25.720
It’s speaking about paradise.
00:10:25.720 → 00:10:26.920
That’s what it is.
00:10:26.920 → 00:10:29.780
It’s a way of speaking about paradise.
00:10:29.780 → 00:10:39.940
And so, not to sort of jump ahead in the exegesis here, but this passage in Ezekiel in a number of places is speaking about the end times.
00:10:39.940 → 00:10:42.100
It’s speaking about the church, the fulfillment.
00:10:42.100 → 00:10:43.440
It’s speaking about the apocalypse.
00:10:43.440 → 00:10:45.220
That’s why you start to get imagery.
00:10:45.220 → 00:10:52.320
I won’t read through the whole thing, I don’t think, but you start to get imagery of these countries from the north coming and attacking Israel.
00:10:52.320 → 00:10:58.340
Well, the problem is they’re riding on horses, and the weapons described are things like daggers.
00:10:58.340 → 00:11:04.620
No one is going to attack modern day Israel, so called, with horses and daggers.
00:11:05.700 → 00:11:07.540
This is imagery of the apocalypse.
00:11:07.540 → 00:11:11.960
It is imagery of Satan’s assault on the church.
00:11:11.960 → 00:11:14.680
And that’s why you have different Jerusalems.
00:11:14.680 → 00:11:29.380
You have the earthly Jerusalem, the children of the slave woman, you have the Jews who are apostate, unbelievers, not part of the promise, and you have the heavenly Jerusalem, which is the mother of those, obviously speaking, symbolically, the mother of those who are believers.
00:11:32.800 → 00:11:36.960
So, continuing on here, we will start with verse 15 now.
00:11:36.960 → 00:11:41.840
I should tab back over to that, so you can all follow along, probably a little easier.
00:11:43.580 → 00:11:51.660
And a word of the Lord came to me saying, Son of man, take for yourself a rod and write on it, Judah and the sons of Israel who are joined to him.
00:11:51.660 → 00:12:00.760
And you shall take for yourself a second rod, and you shall inscribe it for Joseph, the rod of Ephraim, and all the sons of Israel who have been added to him.
00:12:00.760 → 00:12:07.540
And you shall join them to each other into one rod for yourself so as to bind them, and they shall be in your hand.
00:12:07.540 → 00:12:13.960
And it shall be when the sons of your people shall say to you, Will you not proclaim to us what is this thing of yours?
00:12:13.960 → 00:12:24.360
Then you shall say to them, This is what the Lord says, Behold I will take the tribe of Joseph, which is through the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel join to him.
00:12:24.360 → 00:12:30.040
And I will give them on to the tribe of Judah, and they shall be as one rod in the hand of Judah.
00:12:30.040 → 00:12:34.380
And the rods, those upon which you write, shall be in your hand before them.
00:12:34.380 → 00:12:47.740
And you shall say to them, This is what the Lord says, Behold I am taking the whole house of Israel from the midst of the nations, where they went, and I will gather them from all those around them and bring them into the land of Israel.
00:12:47.740 → 00:13:02.560
And I will give them into one nation in my land, and on the mountains of Israel, and they shall have one ruler, and they shall no longer be as two nations, nor shall they be divided into two kingdoms, so that they never again defile themselves with their idols.
00:13:02.560 → 00:13:13.300
And I will rescue them from all their lawless acts, whereby they have sinned, and I will cleanse them, and they shall be for me as a people, and I, the Lord, will be a god for them.
00:13:14.540 → 00:13:21.440
Again, you can see very clearly in this passage, it’s not speaking about earthly, ethnic Israel.
00:13:21.440 → 00:13:29.040
It can’t be, because also later on, the next passage here, I’ll read that in a second.
00:13:29.040 → 00:13:44.960
It’s dealing with the eschaton, it’s dealing with eschatology, the end of all things, because this is the gathering end of all of those who are of the house of Israel, which is to say, again, the church, who will be in paradise with God as their ruler.
00:13:44.960 → 00:13:47.660
Made more obvious by the next passage here.
00:13:47.660 → 00:14:05.300
And my slave or servant, same word in Greek, David shall be ruler in their midst, and they shall all have one shepherd, for they shall walk by my ordinances and keep my judgments and perform them, and they shall live upon their land that I have given to my slave, Jacob.
00:14:05.300 → 00:14:13.180
There were their fathers lived, and they shall live upon it, and David, my slave, shall be their ruler forever.
00:14:13.180 → 00:14:30.440
If it’s talking about an eternal ruler, and it’s talking about David, David is used in the Old Testament in this sense here, typologically of Christ, because of course, no human ruler is going, no merely human ruler, is going to rule them forever.
00:14:30.440 → 00:14:38.420
This is Christ, this is the new Jerusalem, this is the new land of Israel, this is paradise, this is again, talking about the eschaton.
00:14:38.420 → 00:14:51.540
And of course, we know that, because David again, typological of Christ, Christ is the one shepherd, very obvious in the New Testament, I am the good shepherd, I lay down my life for my sheep, and many other places.
00:14:52.420 → 00:15:07.960
And so, we cannot be dealing with an earthly kingdom, because it talks about them following his law, obeying his commandments, walking by his ordinances, no longer sinning.
00:15:07.960 → 00:15:14.820
That’s not something that’s going to happen in this life, in this world, in this creation unrenewed.
00:15:14.820 → 00:15:27.460
That is the next life, that is the creation renewed, purged of sin, where those of us who are in Christ will be ruled by Christ and will no longer sin, no longer have all of the problems we have today.
00:15:27.460 → 00:15:30.380
Concupiscence will no longer be a thing, original sin.
00:15:30.380 → 00:15:35.460
So it’s very clearly speaking of the restoration of all things.
00:15:35.460 → 00:15:40.080
I’m going to skip the bit about all of the nations coming and fighting against Israel.
00:15:40.080 → 00:15:41.340
I’ve already mentioned what that means.
00:15:41.340 → 00:15:42.420
Again, it’s the eschaton.
00:15:42.420 → 00:15:45.960
You can see this in Revelation as well.
00:15:45.960 → 00:15:47.620
This is something that is typological.
00:15:47.620 → 00:15:55.160
It is then echoed in Revelation, speaking of the end times and the assault of Satan and his followers on the church.
00:15:55.160 → 00:15:56.820
That’s all that this is.
00:15:59.300 → 00:16:01.740
I think that’s probably sufficient.
00:16:01.740 → 00:16:10.360
I don’t think I need to read through 38 and 39, because I’ve really touched on how you exegete this entire passage just by reading through 37.
00:16:10.360 → 00:16:15.920
I do, of course, encourage you to go and read all of it, but I’m not going to take the time now to do it.
00:16:17.520 → 00:16:33.420
So, again, I may touch this in an essay at some point, deal with it more thoroughly, but that gives you sort of the starting place to deal with those who talk about this being ethnic Israel, because it’s just very clearly not.
00:16:33.420 → 00:16:47.360
The only way that you can find ethnic Israel here is if you ignore what it’s actually saying about what God is doing, about what God is going to do, about the fact that they’re not going to sin anymore, or they’re going to follow his ordinances.
00:16:47.360 → 00:16:50.200
Look at Israel today, so called.
00:16:50.200 → 00:16:52.100
Are they obeying God?
00:16:52.100 → 00:16:54.140
Are they following his ordinances?
00:16:54.140 → 00:16:54.860
No.
00:16:54.860 → 00:17:03.460
The restoration, so called, of ethnic Israel to that land in 1948 does not fulfill this, because it doesn’t obey what is said here.
00:17:03.460 → 00:17:08.140
They are not subject to David, which is to say Christ.
00:17:08.140 → 00:17:11.040
They are still horrible, sinning Jews.
00:17:11.040 → 00:17:11.960
They don’t believe in God.
00:17:12.480 → 00:17:14.240
They blaspheme him daily.
00:17:15.700 → 00:17:20.200
That’s sort of the Cliff Notes version, again, and the way to deal with this.
00:17:21.220 → 00:17:30.360
And it’s also worth mentioning, you do have sort of cyclical fulfillments of many of the prophecies in the Old Testament, including this one.
00:17:30.360 → 00:17:44.680
And so you do have times where you will have a minor fulfillment, which is a restoration of ethnic Israel, incidentally, not actual Israel, the Northern Kingdom, because they get destroyed completely by the Assyrians.
00:17:44.680 → 00:17:55.180
But you do have the restoration after the Babylonian exile, because the house of Judah was restored to the land, and then dispersed again for being faithless apostates again.
00:17:55.180 → 00:18:04.840
But the ultimate fulfillment of this, the end of the cycle of fulfillments, is the end times, is the restoration of all things.
00:18:04.840 → 00:18:07.360
And it’s worth emphasizing that point.
00:18:08.200 → 00:18:16.560
Again, this cannot be about ethnic Israel, because the northern ten tribes are destroyed completely, they’re gone.
00:18:16.560 → 00:18:28.280
So you can’t have some restoration of the ethnic house of Israel, and the ethnic house of Judah, because the ethnic house of Israel ceased to exist after the Assyrian exile.
00:18:28.280 → 00:18:35.440
Incidentally, also the way that you deal with those who try to say the 144,000 revelation are ethnic Jews.
00:18:35.440 → 00:18:35.880
They can’t be.
00:18:36.520 → 00:18:40.820
First off, the list is wrong, because it’s not actually a list of the tribes.
00:18:40.820 → 00:18:44.480
But then second, it’s very clearly typological.
00:18:44.480 → 00:18:46.620
I’ve talked about that one before, so I won’t get into that now.
00:18:46.620 → 00:18:53.940
But I think that sort of covers it for really most purposes here.
00:18:53.940 → 00:18:57.260
If someone has follow-up questions, of course, I can deal with those later.
00:18:57.260 → 00:19:03.360
But you can also think, of course, Isaiah 56 came to mind while I was thinking about this question.
00:19:03.360 → 00:19:06.940
Also, an eschatological promise, also dealing with the End Times.
00:19:06.940 → 00:19:11.420
I will bring them into my holy mountain and make them joyful in my house of prayer.
00:19:11.420 → 00:19:21.260
Their whole burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be acceptable on my altar, for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations.
00:19:21.260 → 00:19:28.660
Not just dealing with Old Testament, ethnic Israel, all nations, because the gospel is for all peoples, as also seen very clearly in Galatians 3.
00:19:32.340 → 00:19:35.840
The next question is sort of an easier, lighter question.
00:19:35.840 → 00:19:38.040
Let me pull that up here.
00:19:38.040 → 00:19:41.660
Basically, Anglicanism versus Lutheranism.
00:19:41.660 → 00:19:45.940
Not in the sense of them being opposed, but sort of in the sense of which one should I be.
00:19:45.940 → 00:19:49.440
So a little opposition, but I’ll read the question.
00:19:49.440 → 00:19:50.460
Hello, thanks for all you do.
00:19:50.460 → 00:20:02.880
I recently moved, and I am considering joining a Lutheran church, but the hang up is that my ancestors are all from England, both sides, and my grandfather was an Episcopal priest in the 1960s until he passed.
00:20:02.880 → 00:20:10.740
I respect your and Woe’s opinion, and would consider a Lutheran church, but feel the Fourth Commandment leads me to stay Anglican.
00:20:10.740 → 00:20:13.860
Thoughts on participating in the church of my fathers?
00:20:13.860 → 00:20:18.140
I don’t have any problem with the faithful Anglican churches.
00:20:18.140 → 00:20:39.600
Obviously, I disagree with some of their theology, particularly the ones that lean a little more heavily reformed, because as I’ve mentioned before, the Anglican church is a very big umbrella, for a number of reasons, partly due to the empire historically, partly just because it was never really solidified into a single confession to which everyone adhered without exception.
00:20:39.600 → 00:20:43.840
That’s very common over in the reformed camp, and I don’t think that I’m being unfair to the reformed.
00:20:43.840 → 00:20:46.240
I think they would agree with me on that point.
00:20:46.240 → 00:20:51.680
So there are very good Anglican churches, and there are very bad Anglican churches.
00:20:51.680 → 00:20:57.520
The same is true of Lutherans, of course, but, and I’m not just saying Elka, because they’re not even Christian.
00:20:57.520 → 00:21:00.900
There are bad LCMS churches, there are good LCMS churches.
00:21:00.900 → 00:21:03.280
The same thing is true over in the Anglican camp.
00:21:03.280 → 00:21:06.920
If you can find a good Anglican church, by all means attend it.
00:21:06.920 → 00:21:08.980
Yes, I disagree with some of their theology.
00:21:08.980 → 00:21:12.680
Yes, I think there are doctrinal issues, but I still think they’re Christians.
00:21:12.680 → 00:21:14.720
There are faithful Christians in the Anglican church.
00:21:14.720 → 00:21:16.160
You can be Anglican.
00:21:16.160 → 00:21:18.600
There’s also the historical tidbit that is worth mentioning.
00:21:19.660 → 00:21:50.600
The Anglican church proper, as something separate from, in this case, Lutheranism, would not have existed if Henry VIII had not martyred Robert Barnes, because he was initially listening to him, but then, basically due to political shenanigans, very underhanded, but sort of the history of the human species, Robert Barnes was murdered, and so he was the one who was bringing England over to Lutheranism.
00:21:50.600 → 00:21:51.900
He was a friend of Martin Luther.
00:21:51.900 → 00:21:54.760
He had lived with Martin Luther for a period of time.
00:21:54.760 → 00:22:07.800
Martin Luther published his confession and eulogized him, but because of that martyrdom, you wind up with an independent Anglican church distinct from Lutheranism and separated from it.
00:22:07.800 → 00:22:08.860
That’s unfortunate.
00:22:08.860 → 00:22:10.320
It is part of history.
00:22:10.320 → 00:22:11.860
That’s just how it’s gone.
00:22:11.860 → 00:22:16.200
But there wouldn’t be anything wrong if you were to join a Lutheran church.
00:22:16.200 → 00:22:38.060
Effectively, what you would be doing is recognizing that historical reality, that unfortunate historical event, and undoing it in miniature, which I would love to see the Anglican church and the Lutheran church unify under a true confession, which is, say, the Augsburg confession, and no longer have that schism and no longer have that separation.
00:22:38.060 → 00:22:40.060
So, you can join either one.
00:22:40.060 → 00:22:55.100
It’s not a violation of the Fourth Commandment because what you want to do to be true to your forefathers, not just your father, but your grandfather, your great-grandfather, all the way back, is to be a Christian, to be a true Christian, to be a faithful Christian.
00:22:55.100 → 00:22:59.140
And I do believe that you can do that in an Anglican church and you can do that in a Lutheran church.
00:22:59.140 → 00:23:05.700
As a Lutheran, obviously, I believe the Lutheran confession is better than what the Anglican churches confess.
00:23:05.700 → 00:23:08.980
But I don’t think that Anglicans are not Christian.
00:23:08.980 → 00:23:14.860
So, join whichever one you happen to have in your area that is a good church and work to improve it.
00:23:14.860 → 00:23:16.920
That’s the best thing that you can do.
00:23:19.140 → 00:23:24.940
I have sort of a follow-up question here for the next one, a little bit more about baptism.
00:23:24.940 → 00:23:27.760
Unsurprising, that’s going to be a question that comes up a lot.
00:23:29.120 → 00:23:29.960
Hello, Cory.
00:23:29.960 → 00:23:32.960
Hopefully, I am posting a question in the correct part of the forum.
00:23:32.960 → 00:23:33.980
It was fine.
00:23:33.980 → 00:23:35.740
I think I moved it, but it’s good.
00:23:35.740 → 00:23:45.780
Is there a morally permissible means that permits the head of the household, a man, obviously, to administer baptism to those that God has entrusted to his care?
00:23:45.780 → 00:23:51.600
I confess that I’m likely standing in the way of God’s free gift, and that is not what I want to do.
00:23:51.600 → 00:23:56.180
I would rather receive his free gifts and return thanks in his church.
00:23:56.180 → 00:24:02.060
I am hesitant to bring my family into a congregation that is part of a corporation that is demonstrably led by an apostate.
00:24:02.060 → 00:24:05.120
Certainly a problem, and that’s a problem across denominations.
00:24:05.120 → 00:24:08.280
You’re not going to find, unfortunately, good leadership anywhere.
00:24:09.140 → 00:24:11.560
The Roman Catholic Church obviously has…
00:24:11.560 → 00:24:19.880
As a Lutheran, I’m going to say some choice things about the Pope, but the current one is awful, even by the standards of popes, and they’ve had Medici’s as popes.
00:24:19.880 → 00:24:25.760
But the corporate heads of basically every denomination, they’re all terrible.
00:24:27.160 → 00:24:29.560
Thanks in advance for your time in considering my question.
00:24:29.560 → 00:24:33.700
If I missed it in a prior SC episode, I’m sorry.
00:24:33.700 → 00:24:36.940
Thank you for your time and faithful exegesis of Scripture.
00:24:38.120 → 00:24:48.620
So, I have addressed this one before, but it is worth addressing again, because it’s such an important issue, because the sacraments are important, and baptism in particular is important.
00:24:48.620 → 00:24:52.540
Yes, of course, I’m not minimizing the Lord’s Supper anyway.
00:24:52.540 → 00:25:01.360
I recognize that many of those in the ancient church went to the lions, because they would not deny the real presence, the bodily presence of Christ in the Supper.
00:25:01.360 → 00:25:06.020
But baptism is the way that you properly enter the church.
00:25:07.280 → 00:25:14.100
Now, that’s not to say that you cannot have faith from some other means, because there are means of grace, plural.
00:25:14.100 → 00:25:19.100
And so, you can be given faith by hearing, reading the word, right?
00:25:19.100 → 00:25:21.340
That’s one of the means of grace.
00:25:21.340 → 00:25:23.200
Another one is baptism.
00:25:23.200 → 00:25:25.040
Baptism grants faith.
00:25:25.040 → 00:25:29.780
And there’s a follow-up question as well later on, I think, touching on regeneration.
00:25:29.780 → 00:25:31.900
Yes, I may get to that one tonight, I don’t know.
00:25:31.900 → 00:25:35.080
But baptism regenerates.
00:25:35.400 → 00:25:38.160
Baptism grants the free gift of faith.
00:25:38.160 → 00:25:40.040
Baptism is how you enter the church.
00:25:40.040 → 00:25:44.820
It does not mean, again, that you cannot have faith absent baptism.
00:25:44.820 → 00:25:48.880
I’ve explained it before by saying, is baptism necessary?
00:25:48.880 → 00:25:52.320
Yes, but not absolutely so, but yes.
00:25:52.320 → 00:26:06.740
And I’ve explained that, I won’t necessarily go to that right now, but the core of the question here is, can a Christian man, particularly the head of the household, although I won’t limit it to that, because it’s not limited to that, can he baptize the members of his household?
00:26:06.740 → 00:26:10.200
The answer is yes, you can baptize your children.
00:26:10.200 → 00:26:12.660
Is it the ordinary way that things are done?
00:26:12.660 → 00:26:28.680
The answer is no, because the ordinary way that things are done in a Christian society, when everything is functioning as it should, is that the pastor, a member of whose flock you are, baptizes your children as they are born.
00:26:28.680 → 00:26:30.240
That’s the way it should be.
00:26:30.240 → 00:26:31.720
That is the way it was for centuries.
00:26:32.020 → 00:26:34.240
That is the ideal.
00:26:35.220 → 00:26:40.300
We are not necessarily there right now for a number of reasons which we are all well aware.
00:26:40.300 → 00:26:44.600
So, any Christian can administer baptism.
00:26:44.600 → 00:26:45.840
That includes women.
00:26:45.840 → 00:26:59.360
Women can baptize in an emergency, because that is even further outside the norm, because it should be the head of the household, or some male that has an appropriate relationship to the person being baptized.
00:26:59.900 → 00:27:07.600
And so, usually, that’s the minister, the priest, the pastor, but it can be the head of the household, it could be an uncle, a grandfather, whatever.
00:27:07.600 → 00:27:09.760
My father baptized both of my siblings.
00:27:09.760 → 00:27:13.020
Incidentally, he also baptized me, in the church, in my case.
00:27:13.020 → 00:27:15.320
So, nothing wrong with that.
00:27:15.320 → 00:27:17.260
That is entirely fine.
00:27:17.300 → 00:27:21.180
Use the words as instituted in the New Testament.
00:27:21.180 → 00:27:23.040
Go through the ritual of it.
00:27:23.040 → 00:27:24.620
Ritual is important.
00:27:24.620 → 00:27:30.900
It’s not justifying in its own sense, of course, but it is an important part of being a Christian and practicing the Christian faith.
00:27:30.900 → 00:27:32.580
And make sure you have witnesses.
00:27:32.580 → 00:27:35.080
That’s the standard for Biblical baptism.
00:27:35.080 → 00:27:40.000
In the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, with witnesses, water.
00:27:40.000 → 00:27:42.120
It’s water and the Word, because, of course, it’s a sacrament.
00:27:42.120 → 00:27:44.100
It’s not just the water, it’s not just the Word.
00:27:44.100 → 00:27:46.640
It’s the water and the Word together.
00:27:46.640 → 00:27:51.200
So, the short answer, of course, is yes, you can baptize your children.
00:27:51.200 → 00:27:57.500
And if you happen to have access to a Lutheran hymnal, they are all going to have a baptismal rite.
00:27:57.500 → 00:27:58.500
Just follow that.
00:27:58.500 → 00:28:07.580
Or, I think, probably most reformed hymnals, or the equivalent, if they have something separate for their rites, their services, we’ll also have that.
00:28:07.580 → 00:28:10.760
So, there’s even an emergency.
00:28:10.760 → 00:28:12.660
I’m looking at my Lutheran service book here.
00:28:12.660 → 00:28:18.400
But there’s even an emergency form in the back of many, or in the front, depending, of many Lutheran books.
00:28:18.400 → 00:28:24.260
So, in an emergency, if someone needs to baptize someone, that’s something that’s there and available.
00:28:25.220 → 00:28:30.540
So, if you’re on an airplane and it’s going down, by all means, baptize someone with a water bottle.
00:28:30.540 → 00:28:33.620
If you are any Christian, male, female, doesn’t matter.
00:28:39.023 → 00:28:50.763
The next question is again about denominations and kind of denominational differences here, this time in the context of marriage.
00:28:50.763 → 00:28:56.143
As a Christian, is it permissible to marry a Roman Catholic?
00:28:56.143 → 00:29:04.963
I’ll read the rest of the question here, there’s a couple more paragraphs, but I do want to point out first, there are Christian Roman Catholics.
00:29:04.963 → 00:29:07.563
And I know some people think, how can a Lutheran possibly say that?
00:29:08.343 → 00:29:19.223
Our confession, the Book of Concord, says that the Pope is anti-Christ, and basically says everyone should desert him, and some other choice phrases, particularly in certain documents in the Book of Concord.
00:29:19.223 → 00:29:24.403
And that doesn’t mean that there are no Christians in the Roman Church.
00:29:24.403 → 00:29:28.583
Similarly, I believe there are Christians in the Eastern churches.
00:29:28.583 → 00:29:36.483
I believe the Eastern church itself is apostate due to Palomism and a number of other things, but there are Christians in those churches.
00:29:37.203 → 00:29:47.103
Just as there are even some Christians in the Mormon Church, so called, I wouldn’t call it a church, but they like to call themselves that.
00:29:47.103 → 00:29:59.443
In the lower levels of that, before they become a temple Mormon, which is what they call them, before they get initiated into the mysteries, because it is a mystery cult, there are people who just believe in Christ.
00:29:59.443 → 00:30:04.563
In the simplicity of their ignorance, they hold to Christ, they believe in Christ, that makes them a Christian.
00:30:05.303 → 00:30:06.543
Are they a good Christian?
00:30:06.543 → 00:30:09.843
Not particularly, but that’s not what saves you.
00:30:09.843 → 00:30:14.623
What saves you is belief in Christ, faith in Christ, the free gift of faith.
00:30:14.623 → 00:30:16.563
And there are Christians in the Roman Church.
00:30:16.563 → 00:30:19.123
So, continuing on the rest of the question.
00:30:19.123 → 00:30:22.283
I’m a young man who’s pursuing a relationship with a woman about my age.
00:30:22.283 → 00:30:30.003
She is a Christian, as am I, but she is currently in RCIA with a strong intention to convert to Roman Catholicism.
00:30:30.003 → 00:30:36.563
I am unsure about marrying this woman if she converts to Roman Catholicism, as the differences may be irreconcilable.
00:30:36.563 → 00:30:41.183
Is there a middle ground that we can reach, or should I shake the dust off my feet?
00:30:42.983 → 00:30:45.023
This touches on a number of things.
00:30:45.023 → 00:30:54.543
The core here, though, and I think that’s the bulk of what I’ll address, is that a woman is supposed to follow her husband, period.
00:30:54.603 → 00:30:55.843
Scripture is very clear.
00:30:55.843 → 00:31:01.283
Wives submit to your husbands in all things as you would unto the Lord.
00:31:01.283 → 00:31:03.923
That certainly includes in theological matters.
00:31:03.923 → 00:31:07.443
And so, a wife is to follow her husband.
00:31:07.443 → 00:31:12.543
If he’s a Presbyterian, you are a Presbyterian, your children are Presbyterians.
00:31:12.543 → 00:31:16.863
If he’s a Lutheran, you’re a Lutheran, your children are Lutherans.
00:31:16.863 → 00:31:19.223
And that is the way things are supposed to go.
00:31:20.543 → 00:31:25.943
Now, if a husband becomes completely apostate, right?
00:31:25.943 → 00:31:40.603
Let’s say he goes from being some Christian denomination, pick whichever one you like, to a neo-pagan, or a Muslim, or a Mormon, or God forbid, someone who follows the Talmud, right?
00:31:40.603 → 00:31:44.303
Then no, she can’t follow him in that, because you must obey God rather than men.
00:31:44.303 → 00:31:52.143
That would be an exception to that complete submission to her husband, because it is as you would submit unto Christ, right?
00:31:52.143 → 00:31:53.863
There’s a limitation there.
00:31:53.863 → 00:32:01.863
It’s a minor limitation, because it is comparable to when slaves are to submit to their masters, even to bad masters.
00:32:01.863 → 00:32:05.903
And so wives are to submit to their husbands, even when they aren’t good husbands.
00:32:05.903 → 00:32:13.063
Now, husbands should endeavor to love their wives, of course, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, among other passages.
00:32:14.143 → 00:32:24.103
But you are to follow wives, you are to follow your husband with regard to what denomination he chooses to be a Christian.
00:32:24.103 → 00:32:30.803
And so, to answer your specific question, she has to follow you if she is going to be your wife.
00:32:30.803 → 00:32:33.683
So you need to have a serious conversation with her.
00:32:33.683 → 00:32:38.263
If I am a Presbyterian, or whatever you happen to be, right?
00:32:38.263 → 00:32:39.823
Are you going to be a Presbyterian?
00:32:40.483 → 00:32:44.623
Or are you going to continue to insist on being a Roman Catholic in this case?
00:32:44.623 → 00:32:46.003
Something else.
00:32:46.003 → 00:32:49.243
And is that going to be a constant source of conflict in the marriage?
00:32:49.243 → 00:32:51.063
How are you going to raise the children?
00:32:51.063 → 00:32:54.283
Are you going to teach them to be Presbyterian, and she’s going to teach them to be Roman Catholic?
00:32:54.283 → 00:32:56.203
That doesn’t work.
00:32:56.203 → 00:32:57.763
She has to submit.
00:32:57.763 → 00:33:05.223
If she is unwilling to do that, it is going to cause you nothing but strife in your marriage, and she’s already demonstrated she’s not going to be a faithful wife.
00:33:06.243 → 00:33:10.723
So, wisdom would dictate you probably should look elsewhere.
00:33:10.723 → 00:33:18.043
Hopefully, she recognizes that her duty in scripture, her duty to God, is to submit to you if you are her husband.
00:33:18.043 → 00:33:20.823
If she’s willing to do that, then there’s no problem.
00:33:20.823 → 00:33:27.683
Lead her back into what you believe to be the true faith and out of what she is currently investigating.
00:33:27.683 → 00:33:41.963
That is, to some degree, on you, and if you are able to do that, if she is willing to listen, if she’s willing to submit and obey, then by all means, she makes a great wife, marry her, may you have many children, and be blessed by the Lord.
00:33:41.963 → 00:33:46.443
But it comes down to whether or not she is willing to do what scripture commands her to do, to be an actual wife.
00:33:53.874 → 00:34:00.814
The next question is again about sort of house churches and what to do under current circumstances.
00:34:02.354 → 00:34:06.114
That is, starting a home church, a follow-up question to that.
00:34:06.114 → 00:34:12.714
What do you recommend doing if one is new in an area or traveling and does not have a group to start a home church?
00:34:12.714 → 00:34:17.614
Is there a kind of lay service one can do at home, which is different from regular daily devotions?
00:34:17.614 → 00:34:18.974
There is.
00:34:18.974 → 00:34:20.134
Follow-up to that.
00:34:20.134 → 00:34:28.734
Perhaps it would be a good idea for people interested in doing this to organize some kind of locator map or resource to indicate if there are others in the area who would be interested in doing that.
00:34:28.734 → 00:34:30.294
Certainly, that’s important.
00:34:30.294 → 00:34:37.574
Probably a little less so when traveling, because if you’re organizing a group, you kind of want to have the regularity of being able to meet together.
00:34:37.574 → 00:34:47.154
But certainly, if you cannot find a good church, because obviously, do not forsake the gathering together of the saints and all the other injunctions.
00:34:47.154 → 00:34:50.414
If you can find a good church while you’re traveling, just go to that church.
00:34:50.414 → 00:34:51.294
It doesn’t have to be perfect.
00:34:51.494 → 00:34:55.854
You’re going for one service, two, three at the most, right?
00:34:55.854 → 00:34:58.514
Maybe a couple of years if you travel frequently, whatever it happens to be.
00:34:58.514 → 00:35:00.754
By all means, just find a church and attend it.
00:35:00.754 → 00:35:08.754
I’ve done that when, in various other places, even going to LCMS churches, despite the LCMS’s corporate opinion of me.
00:35:08.754 → 00:35:10.494
I’ll take a sip of tea here.
00:35:14.294 → 00:35:17.574
But yes, you can just find a faithful church and attend it.
00:35:17.574 → 00:35:26.394
And if you can’t find that, then by all means, simply find a rite that you can do at home, just a basic church service.
00:35:26.394 → 00:35:37.434
You know, you’re basically going to have a prayer, say the Lord’s Prayer, recite the creed, whether it happens to be the Apostles of the Nicene, or if it’s the Trinity Sunday, then the Athanasian.
00:35:37.434 → 00:35:41.794
And you’re not going to have the Lord’s Supper by yourself.
00:35:41.994 → 00:35:43.554
That would be inappropriate.
00:35:43.554 → 00:35:47.054
And you’re not going to have the corporate absolution.
00:35:47.334 → 00:35:53.434
But you don’t need the corporate absolution, because you know that all of your sins are forgiven before you commit them.
00:35:53.434 → 00:35:55.854
God has already forgiven all your sins in Christ.
00:35:55.854 → 00:35:57.674
It’s good to have that reminder.
00:35:57.674 → 00:36:04.634
God is super abundant in His grace and how He delivers His forgiveness to us, His good gifts to us.
00:36:04.634 → 00:36:07.434
But you don’t need all of them all the time.
00:36:07.434 → 00:36:09.214
It’s not absolutely necessary.
00:36:09.214 → 00:36:10.694
So yes, you can just follow a rite.
00:36:10.694 → 00:36:13.274
There’s a rite in the Lutheran service book I keep looking at.
00:36:13.274 → 00:36:15.094
I should have put it on my desk.
00:36:15.094 → 00:36:16.554
But you can just follow that.
00:36:16.694 → 00:36:18.334
It’s available online.
00:36:18.334 → 00:36:22.474
If you are part of some other denomination, then they undoubtedly have one as well.
00:36:22.474 → 00:36:27.774
You can probably find it in your equivalent of the service book or the hymnal, whichever you happen to use.
00:36:27.774 → 00:36:29.714
So I would say just go through that.
00:36:29.714 → 00:36:32.354
That’s probably the best way to do it.
00:36:34.674 → 00:36:37.734
The next question here, let me pull that up.
00:36:39.934 → 00:36:41.794
Maybe I don’t have my notes there.
00:36:45.094 → 00:36:51.214
Apparently, we’re significantly shifting categories here and sorts of questions.
00:36:51.214 → 00:36:56.754
In the context of the marriage bed, are erotic fantasies shared between husband and wife a sin?
00:36:56.754 → 00:37:01.214
The short answer to that is no.
00:37:01.214 → 00:37:16.034
The sort of longer answer is that to some degree, it depends because if you are imagining your spouse is another person, that’s inappropriate because that is mental adultery.
00:37:16.034 → 00:37:24.914
Coupled with an act that isn’t itself adultery, but is certainly inappropriate because of the nature of what you have associated with it.
00:37:24.914 → 00:37:28.574
Because you’re supposed to be pure not just in body but also in mind.
00:37:28.574 → 00:37:35.834
But I guess to give a not too concrete of an example as to not be inappropriate or get banned.
00:37:35.834 → 00:37:42.534
But if you want your wife to wear a cheerleader outfit, whatever, have fun, that’s between you and your wife.
00:37:42.534 → 00:37:45.554
God’s not going to object to that, you’re allowed to do that.
00:37:46.194 → 00:37:47.414
That’s not a problem.
00:37:47.414 → 00:37:52.094
Just don’t do anything that’s extreme or against conscience.
00:37:52.094 → 00:37:53.694
That’s the line here.
00:37:53.694 → 00:37:58.534
Your conscience is going to tell you when you’re doing something that’s over the line.
00:37:58.534 → 00:38:01.894
God gave you that to help you know what you should and shouldn’t do.
00:38:01.894 → 00:38:03.814
Listen to your conscience.
00:38:03.814 → 00:38:06.754
That’s the Holy Spirit inside you saying, you shouldn’t do this, right?
00:38:07.514 → 00:38:09.574
So, is it fine?
00:38:09.574 → 00:38:11.834
Yes, but don’t go overboard.
00:38:13.834 → 00:38:14.894
Take another sip of tea.
00:38:20.505 → 00:38:24.065
Eventually get a British audience just from sipping tea.
00:38:24.065 → 00:38:27.325
Although they might object to the brand I drink.
00:38:27.325 → 00:38:29.765
Tea people get very weird about brands.
00:38:31.065 → 00:38:36.605
The next question is, again, going back to baptism just briefly.
00:38:36.605 → 00:38:45.165
And the question is about regeneration and how that interacts with baptism, how baptism and regeneration are related.
00:38:45.165 → 00:38:53.965
And I won’t read the question because it was just sort of a paragraph, objection slash response in the comments to an episode, I think, a couple of weeks ago.
00:38:53.965 → 00:39:04.465
But the difference here is going to be between Lutherans and the Reformed in how we understand what baptism is and what baptism does.
00:39:04.465 → 00:39:11.365
There’s some difficulty in addressing this because the Reformed are not a monolithic camp.
00:39:11.365 → 00:39:19.345
For Lutherans, I can give a definitive answer because I could just pull out the Book of Concord that I have.
00:39:19.345 → 00:39:23.565
It’s actually, I think, on my floor right now, but sitting over here and just read it.
00:39:23.565 → 00:39:25.065
That’s the Lutheran answer.
00:39:25.065 → 00:39:29.705
So if you want the Lutheran answer, go to the Book of Concord, read the articles on baptism.
00:39:29.705 → 00:39:30.285
That’s it.
00:39:30.285 → 00:39:31.785
That’s our answer.
00:39:31.785 → 00:39:40.585
And so the Lutheran conception is that baptism regenerates because baptism grants you faith.
00:39:40.585 → 00:39:45.845
Faith and regeneration are not identical, but they are simultaneous.
00:39:45.925 → 00:39:49.505
They are not divided necessarily logically even.
00:39:49.505 → 00:39:54.505
They are certainly not divided in time in Lutheran theology.
00:39:54.505 → 00:40:10.065
They are for the reformed, because the reformed believe that God comes in and regenerates you prior to these things, because unless you are regenerated, you can’t do any of the stuff that follows.
00:40:10.065 → 00:40:14.965
Lutherans don’t have that sort of logical or chronological distinction between the two.
00:40:15.885 → 00:40:17.645
It’s all sort of simultaneous.
00:40:17.645 → 00:40:19.245
It’s at the same time.
00:40:19.245 → 00:40:23.265
That’s the distinction between the Lutheran and the reformed position on it.
00:40:23.265 → 00:40:31.285
And the reformed are going to have more of a symbolic view of baptism.
00:40:31.285 → 00:40:41.065
Baptism is a seal of your faith, as opposed to the Lutheran view, which is baptism gives you faith, again, depending on whether or not you already have faith, right?
00:40:41.065 → 00:40:44.165
Because we do believe in the means, plural, of grace.
00:40:44.665 → 00:40:48.425
And so, maybe you have faith already from reading the word or from hearing the word.
00:40:48.425 → 00:40:58.825
In that case, baptism, yes, it is a confirmation of your faith, it strengthens your faith, but in the ordinary course of things, you enter the church as an infant being baptized.
00:40:58.825 → 00:41:09.145
And if you want to read about infant baptism, then Luther has an excellent piece on it in the Book of Concord, specifically on infant baptism and why we baptize infants.
00:41:09.145 → 00:41:17.165
Basically because the Lutheran conception, which I would say is what scripture teaches very clearly, it is entirely God’s work.
00:41:17.165 → 00:41:25.905
And so, you can’t worry about the status of the person being baptized so much because God is the one doing the work.
00:41:25.905 → 00:41:27.985
You aren’t doing anything in baptism.
00:41:27.985 → 00:41:29.885
You are having something done to you.
00:41:29.885 → 00:41:31.425
It is a different thing.
00:41:31.425 → 00:41:45.645
So, that’s basically the difference between the regeneration view, the doctrine of regeneration in Lutheran theology versus the Reformed, without getting into all the minor distinctions of the different Reformed camps.
00:41:45.645 → 00:41:49.685
Because if you want those, it’s probably better to ask someone who is himself Reformed.
00:41:49.685 → 00:41:55.805
I’m familiar with a lot of them, but it’s probably better if a Reformed theologian answers that instead of a Lutheran one.
00:41:55.805 → 00:42:00.985
Right.
00:42:00.985 → 00:42:05.845
The next one is shifting gears here a little bit, talking about China.
00:42:05.845 → 00:42:07.765
I always find it funny when I talk about China while drinking tea.
00:42:09.305 → 00:42:18.605
But, refresh my tea here without pouring it on my stream deck, which would be very bad.
00:42:21.605 → 00:42:32.905
The question now is about politics and China, and the normalization of relations with China, and the most favored nation status.
00:42:32.905 → 00:42:43.325
And it’s probably useful first to tell people what most favored nation status is, because not everyone is familiar with international law and how that works.
00:42:43.325 → 00:42:50.205
So, the most favored nation status is a particular term of art in international law.
00:42:50.205 → 00:43:01.065
It’s technically a different term under US law now, because it was codified differently, but you’re going to see most favored nation status, and they are equivalent, so you can ignore the other one.
00:43:01.065 → 00:43:21.525
Most favored nation status means simply, and in summary, that a nation will receive the sort of treatment that is afforded to the most favored, which is to say the most preferenced or the nation with the most beneficial relationship with the nation in question.
00:43:21.525 → 00:43:28.825
So, for instance, to give a concrete example to make it easier to understand, and then I’ll get into a little bit more of how that works in practice.
00:43:30.125 → 00:43:39.625
If we afford a status to Japan, right, of having no tariffs, so free trade, actual free trade.
00:43:39.625 → 00:43:49.905
If we then grant most favored nation status to another country, say Thailand, we have to also grant them that free trade status, no tariffs.
00:43:49.905 → 00:44:03.445
Now, how it works in practice is that if you are a member of the WTO, the World Trade Organization, you basically automatically grant this status to every other member of the WTO.
00:44:03.445 → 00:44:06.385
That’s effectively what the World Trade Organization is.
00:44:06.385 → 00:44:08.045
It’s granting most favored nation status.
00:44:08.045 → 00:44:14.325
There’s some more stuff to it than that, obviously, but it’s granting that status to member nations in order to encourage free trade.
00:44:14.325 → 00:44:22.245
We can get into what free trade is, and why it’s a problem, and why it’s not great, and the WTO has a lot of problems, but that’s how it functions in reality.
00:44:22.985 → 00:44:32.245
And so, you can take exceptions, and you can enact restrictions and other things on countries, but it is an exception to the general rule.
00:44:32.245 → 00:44:35.925
The US sort of has most favored nation status with almost every other nation.
00:44:35.925 → 00:44:38.145
It’s just sort of how we conduct business.
00:44:38.145 → 00:44:56.865
And so, to answer the question, I don’t necessarily think that we should, I guess, de-normalize or un-naturalize or whatever term you want to use, relationships, our relationships specifically with China, but we should not give them most favored nation status.
00:44:56.865 → 00:45:07.065
In fact, I would just withdraw from the WTO and no longer just hand out MFN like candy to every other nation in the world because it’s not beneficial to Americans.
00:45:07.065 → 00:45:08.545
It’s not beneficial to us.
00:45:08.545 → 00:45:10.325
It harms our people.
00:45:10.325 → 00:45:16.305
It benefits large conglomerates and banks in particular.
00:45:16.305 → 00:45:17.285
It doesn’t benefit us.
00:45:18.345 → 00:45:32.265
We should hand that out sparingly to nations that are actually friendly nations, nations that are proper allies, other Christian nations, our actual friends, not to everyone on the planet.
00:45:32.265 → 00:45:36.485
And certainly handing it out to China has hollowed out our manufacturing.
00:45:36.485 → 00:45:41.125
You have the so-called rust belt now, which I hate that it’s called that, but it’s somewhat accurate.
00:45:41.125 → 00:45:45.405
It hollowed out basically everything in our economy, in the middle, the core of our economy.
00:45:45.465 → 00:45:51.765
It’s one of the reasons that we could no longer do what we’ve done in past wars for good or ill.
00:45:51.765 → 00:45:58.225
We can’t field massive armament at this point because we don’t have the manufacturing capacity.
00:45:58.225 → 00:45:59.405
Everything’s produced in China.
00:45:59.405 → 00:46:03.965
Look at the stuff on, if you’re sitting at your desk right now listening to this, look at the stuff on your desk.
00:46:03.965 → 00:46:05.745
How much of it was made in China?
00:46:05.745 → 00:46:07.345
Probably the majority.
00:46:07.345 → 00:46:09.065
That’s no way for a country to function.
00:46:09.065 → 00:46:10.585
That’s terrible.
00:46:10.585 → 00:46:13.085
To say nothing of the quality issues with everything made in China.
00:46:13.765 → 00:46:19.385
So, the short answer is yes, we should get rid of most favored nation status for China.
00:46:19.385 → 00:46:24.925
But I don’t think we have to go to the point of, you know, terminating relations with China.
00:46:24.925 → 00:46:29.825
We can’t really do that because China is aiming to be a hegemon.
00:46:29.825 → 00:46:32.965
They are certainly relevant in the political theater.
00:46:32.965 → 00:46:40.085
They’re nowhere near a hegemon yet, but they could certainly inflict serious harm to the United States and to most of the world.
00:46:40.085 → 00:46:46.785
And so, we have to recognize them to some degree, and interact with them diplomatically, politically, things like that.
00:46:46.785 → 00:46:53.125
But we should not be trading with them in so-called free trade, because again, it’s harmful to our people.
00:46:55.945 → 00:46:58.185
So, the next question.
00:46:59.625 → 00:47:10.905
Someone sort of objected to my formulation in a previous episode of The Nature of Christ, The Two Natures in Christ, God and Man.
00:47:12.045 → 00:47:27.225
I’m just going to go ahead and say that what he said, and you can find the comment, certainly, if you’re so inclined, but I’m going to say that what he said is simply wrong, because it starts to get into the point of almost denying the deity of Christ.
00:47:27.225 → 00:47:38.045
So, my answer for this is always going to be what any Christian should answer anytime the Trinity comes up or the hard questions like that.
00:47:38.045 → 00:47:40.225
And that’s going to be the Athanasian creed.
00:47:40.625 → 00:47:42.165
That’s my answer.
00:47:42.165 → 00:47:47.245
And yes, you can find that on the bookofconchord.org if you just type slash C3.
00:47:47.245 → 00:47:52.105
C1 goes to the Apostles, C2 to the Nicene, and C3 to the Athanasian.
00:47:52.105 → 00:47:58.385
So, of course, my answer would just be, whosoever will be saved before all things, it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith.
00:47:58.385 → 00:48:01.205
Catholic lowercase C meaning universal.
00:48:01.205 → 00:48:06.505
Which faith except everyone do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
00:48:08.105 → 00:48:12.445
And then, skipping to the relevant one to this question.
00:48:12.445 → 00:48:20.965
Furthermore, it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe faithfully the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ.
00:48:20.965 → 00:48:28.745
For the right faith is that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and man.
00:48:28.745 → 00:49:35.445
God of the substance of the Father begotten before the worlds, and man of the substance of his mother, born in the world, perfect God and perfect man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting, equal to the Father as touching his Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching his manhood, who although he be God and man, yet he is not two, but one Christ, one not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking the manhood into God, one altogether not by confusion of the substance, but by unity of person, for as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ, who suffered for our salvation, descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead, he ascended into heaven, he sitteth on the right hand of the Father God Almighty, whence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead, at whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies, and shall give an account of their own works, and they that have done good shall go into life everlasting, and they that have done evil, into everlasting fire.
00:49:35.445 → 00:49:44.105
This is the Catholic faith, which except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.
00:49:44.105 → 00:49:56.425
That is the answer when anyone brings up if Christ is true God and true man, or the Trinity or anything like that, obviously, there’s other parts of this particular creed about the Trinity, and you’d want to bring those up in that case.
00:49:56.425 → 00:50:09.265
And then for anyone who wants to read more in depth about the theology of the natures in Christ and related matters, and I don’t recommend it for everyone, because it’s not for everyone.
00:50:09.265 → 00:50:11.805
It’s sort of a high-level theological topic.
00:50:11.805 → 00:50:13.225
Not everyone needs to read about it.
00:50:13.225 → 00:50:16.105
Not everyone needs to try to understand it thoroughly.
00:50:16.105 → 00:50:20.345
And there are going to be limitations, because you’re getting into mystery at this point.
00:50:20.345 → 00:50:23.425
How can you be fully God and fully man?
00:50:23.425 → 00:50:25.625
That seems counter to our reason.
00:50:25.625 → 00:50:28.925
It seems like something that doesn’t make sense, because it’s a mystery.
00:50:29.585 → 00:50:32.625
The same thing as the faith, ultimately, is a mystery.
00:50:32.625 → 00:50:34.985
There’s nothing wrong with the word mystery.
00:50:34.985 → 00:50:36.325
It’s not a dirty word.
00:50:36.325 → 00:50:37.645
It’s part of our faith.
00:50:37.645 → 00:50:39.645
It’s part of Christianity.
00:50:39.645 → 00:50:45.825
And of course, the sacraments are called mysteries, when you’re talking about the Greek, as opposed to the Latin, from which we get sacrament.
00:50:45.825 → 00:50:51.005
But my recommendation for those who want to read more about it, a good starting place is Peeper’s Dogmatics.
00:50:51.005 → 00:50:56.085
He deals with the issue thoroughly in a way that is very well explained.
00:50:56.085 → 00:50:56.945
He does a very good job.
00:50:56.945 → 00:50:58.405
That’s a three-volume set.
00:50:58.465 → 00:51:00.805
There’s a fourth volume that’s just the index.
00:51:00.805 → 00:51:03.165
You can usually find it pretty cheap secondhand.
00:51:03.165 → 00:51:05.945
Probably don’t buy it new from CPH, the overcharge.
00:51:05.945 → 00:51:09.445
But if you are so inclined, that’s what I would recommend reading.
00:51:11.025 → 00:51:14.045
So I can get rid of the browser there.
00:51:14.045 → 00:51:16.105
Pull up the next question.
00:51:17.705 → 00:51:25.185
The next question is about the Septuagint translation and sort of the recommendations that we gave in the Stone Choir episode on that.
00:51:26.085 → 00:51:30.685
The question is, is there any progress toward that translation presently?
00:51:30.685 → 00:51:38.085
There are a lot of men who, excuse me, there are a lot of men who have worked on snippets here and there, small parts of it.
00:51:38.085 → 00:51:40.845
I know they’re those who translated bits and pieces.
00:51:40.845 → 00:51:43.985
That’s not ultimately what we want, right?
00:51:43.985 → 00:51:46.705
We described that very thoroughly in the episode.
00:51:46.705 → 00:51:51.985
I am not aware of any organized overarching effort yet to produce that translation.
00:51:52.985 → 00:51:59.205
That’s going to be a significant cost, as we outlined in the episode, and it’s going to be a significant undertaking.
00:51:59.205 → 00:52:09.085
And Woe and I are not going to be the ones to do it, because we’re not translators, we’re not sufficiently versed in the languages.
00:52:09.085 → 00:52:11.945
I’m not fully fluent in Greek, for instance.
00:52:11.945 → 00:52:13.105
Neither is he.
00:52:13.105 → 00:52:15.845
And so we’re not the ones to do that.
00:52:15.845 → 00:52:35.865
And again, we’re also not the ones to do that for the reasons we outlined in the episode, because, for instance, when I am reading the daily readings, and now I read the Old Testament reading and, of course, the Psalter being part of the Old Testament from the Septuagint, I changed over to doing that for the daily readings some time back.
00:52:35.865 → 00:52:42.185
I’m certainly doing that for the balance of however long I’m going to keep doing it, as long as God lets me.
00:52:43.265 → 00:52:58.425
When I read those, mentally, I recall the Masoretic version, because I read the Masoretic version in the ESV so many times that I have huge chunks of the Psalter effectively memorized.
00:52:58.425 → 00:53:01.045
That’s why I can just bring it to mind when I’m speaking.
00:53:01.045 → 00:53:03.405
I can quote these things.
00:53:03.405 → 00:53:10.745
That’s not what you want when you’re trying to translate something faithfully without these external malign influences.
00:53:10.745 → 00:53:11.885
So we’re not the right men to do it.
00:53:13.025 → 00:53:29.965
So the restrictions that we spoke about in that episode are going to be absolutely key in order to produce something that is what the church can use for 100 years, for 200 years, however long the language doesn’t evolve past the point where it is comprehensible.
00:53:29.965 → 00:53:37.245
Because we don’t want to rely on it to the point where it’s like the 1611 KJV, which even the KJV-only people have to admit they can’t read.
00:53:37.245 → 00:53:40.965
Because certainly they read the updated one with orthography and things like that.
00:53:42.065 → 00:53:49.845
So, the short answer is no, I’m not aware of any organized effort yet, but I’m also not the one who’s going to be doing it.
00:53:49.845 → 00:53:56.645
But of course, I will tell people, if such an effort materializes, I will certainly inform people that it has begun.
00:53:56.645 → 00:53:59.565
And here’s how you can support them sort of thing.
00:54:01.425 → 00:54:14.105
Those are the questions that I had written down for this episode, but I think I will scroll quickly through the chat, which is thankfully loading on the website, although still not loading in the plugin.
00:54:23.022 → 00:54:25.182
Here’s an easy question.
00:54:25.182 → 00:54:28.302
I am an aspiring attorney currently studying for the LSAT.
00:54:28.302 → 00:54:29.102
I do recommend that.
00:54:29.102 → 00:54:35.802
I did not study for the LSAT, which is probably not the way to do it, but I am starting my legal journey somewhat late as I’m 30 years old.
00:54:35.802 → 00:54:36.922
It’s not too late.
00:54:36.922 → 00:54:43.382
Tech background, do you recommend I prioritize law school rank or location slash scholarships?
00:54:43.382 → 00:54:47.842
The general answer to that is always going to be rank, because that’s just how it works.
00:54:47.842 → 00:54:51.862
Particularly if you can get into top 10, but, you know, top 20, whatever it happens to be.
00:54:53.002 → 00:54:58.902
Secondary to that, and in some specific cases, more important, connections.
00:54:58.902 → 00:55:05.682
Can you get connections that will get you a good job when you graduate if you go to x law school, right?
00:55:05.682 → 00:55:19.682
So, if you go to one of your regional law schools, whatever it happens to be, maybe it’s not the top 20, maybe it’s not even top 50, but you can get a job with a good local firm where you want to work right at a law school, by all means, take that one.
00:55:20.522 → 00:55:26.302
But, generally speaking, you want to go to a top level firm.
00:55:26.302 → 00:55:31.262
And I see here that you followed up by saying intellectual property, same answer.
00:55:31.262 → 00:55:41.782
If you want to work for a major international firm, you’re probably going to want to go to one of those top 10 schools if you can get into one, because the name on your resume is going to matter a lot.
00:55:41.782 → 00:55:47.262
In fact, a lot of times, I’ve spoken to partners at certain firms, they throw your cover letter away.
00:55:47.882 → 00:55:53.942
You still have to write it, it still has to be good, but good chance the partner is just going to shred it.
00:55:53.942 → 00:55:58.742
And he’s going to look at where you went to school, and a couple of other key things on your resume.
00:55:58.742 → 00:56:05.862
So the better the school you can have on that resume, the better your odds of getting that job if that’s what you want.
00:56:05.862 → 00:56:14.322
But if you want to work for, again, that local firm, maybe you happen to know a partner at that firm, or several partners even better, then go to whichever school they like if they’re going to hire you.
00:56:15.562 → 00:56:27.202
So, you’re going to be a slave for your first year as an associate, and probably your second year, and maybe your third year, but I’m sure you already know that, so that’s just how it works in big law.
00:56:27.202 → 00:56:33.362
But yes, the ranking of your school does actually matter when it comes to law school, for better or worse.
00:56:36.722 → 00:56:39.522
A question about the South African National Party.
00:56:39.522 → 00:56:46.722
I am insufficiently familiar with them to answer it right now, so I will note that down for perhaps next week.
00:56:50.682 → 00:57:02.282
Does Matthew 21, the parable of the tenents, when the Lord said to the Pharisees, the kingdom of God would be given to another people, ethnos, of course, just being the Greek there, does this refer to the prophecy of Japheth in Genesis 9?
00:57:02.282 → 00:57:04.822
Yes, Christ is echoing that.
00:57:04.822 → 00:57:14.942
That was the Jews being wicked and apostate and not producing the works because I don’t want to get too into depth into this right now.
00:57:14.942 → 00:57:16.082
I’ve done that before.
00:57:16.082 → 00:57:29.682
But the whole point of ethnic Israel and their place in the Old Testament was that they were supposed to be a nation of faithful priests to spread the word to other peoples.
00:57:29.682 → 00:57:31.442
That was the whole point.
00:57:31.442 → 00:57:37.422
God wanted to restore a faithful understanding of His word to the entire world.
00:57:38.122 → 00:57:41.882
And so, they were supposed to go out into the world and spread the word.
00:57:41.882 → 00:57:42.962
That was their duty.
00:57:42.962 → 00:57:44.562
It was what God tasked them to do.
00:57:44.562 → 00:57:47.782
He told them they were going to be a nation of priests.
00:57:47.782 → 00:57:49.122
They didn’t do that.
00:57:49.122 → 00:57:50.722
They decided to be insular.
00:57:50.722 → 00:57:52.422
They decided, well, God picked us.
00:57:52.422 → 00:57:53.822
We’re the best people in the world.
00:57:53.822 → 00:57:56.642
We’re not going to tell anyone about God.
00:57:56.642 → 00:57:58.122
They became apostate.
00:57:58.122 → 00:58:03.242
They made themselves into their own God, and they wound up worshiping Satan in the process.
00:58:03.242 → 00:58:06.682
And so, they completely and utterly failed.
00:58:07.242 → 00:58:19.542
You know, you can talk about middle knowledge and other worlds and counter histories and things like that, but that stuff doesn’t really matter, because you look at the actual history of what happened, they failed in the task given them by God.
00:58:19.542 → 00:58:21.522
God knew that was going to happen.
00:58:21.522 → 00:58:28.382
He knew it was going to happen beforehand, and his plan accounts for their wickedness, their apostasy, their failure.
00:58:28.382 → 00:58:34.922
And it fulfills the prophecy to Japheth that he will dwell in the tents of Shem, which say he will become Christendom.
00:58:35.422 → 00:58:36.682
And that’s what we did.
00:58:36.682 → 00:58:39.142
Our ancestors became Christendom.
00:58:39.142 → 00:58:41.102
Our ancestors built the church.
00:58:41.102 → 00:58:49.602
Our ancestors took the faith to the entire world, whether they accepted it or rejected it, whether they hated us or loved us, and usually they hated us and rejected it.
00:58:49.602 → 00:58:56.062
But we fulfilled what God prophesied all the way back by Father Noah.
00:58:56.062 → 00:59:01.182
And so, yes, Christ is echoing that there when he’s speaking to the Pharisees, and he’s not speaking just to them.
00:59:01.182 → 00:59:02.822
He’s speaking to the wicked apostate Jews.
00:59:03.682 → 00:59:05.462
And that’s not to say that no Jews converted, of course.
00:59:05.462 → 00:59:06.842
I’ve never said that.
00:59:06.842 → 00:59:14.902
Because it says, for instance, though Israel be as numerous of the sand of the seashore, only a remnant will be saved.
00:59:14.902 → 00:59:23.262
Well, the remnant was saved in the first century AD, because many of them converted and were then murdered for their trouble by their erstwhile brothers.
00:59:27.342 → 00:59:29.162
Someone asked, is the Q&A for Superchats only?
00:59:29.162 → 00:59:30.362
The answer is no.
00:59:31.302 → 00:59:35.002
Because obviously, I’ll just answer whatever question happens to come up.
00:59:35.002 → 00:59:38.662
I do prioritize the questions asked in the forum.
00:59:38.662 → 00:59:42.342
That’s almost purely for sort of administrative purposes.
00:59:42.342 → 00:59:49.562
It just makes my life a lot easier, because I can link to them, and I can say it was answered, and then I can make it searchable and things like that.
00:59:49.562 → 00:59:51.382
It’s just easier for me.
00:59:51.382 → 00:59:59.302
It fulfills the purposes of what I’m trying to do here, which is making a catalog of answers to questions, instead of having to constantly answer them again and again and again.
01:00:00.022 → 01:00:03.442
I don’t have a problem with necessarily answering the same thing repeatedly.
01:00:03.442 → 01:00:11.022
We can think, for instance, of Luther’s comments in The Small Catechism about learning the same thing over and over, and God teaching the same thing every day.
01:00:11.022 → 01:00:13.822
And so there’s nothing wrong with repetition per se.
01:00:13.822 → 01:00:21.222
But it is useful to have a catalog of answers, and questions asked on the forum make that a lot easier for me.
01:00:21.222 → 01:00:23.182
That’s why I prioritize those.
01:00:23.182 → 01:00:33.002
And quite frankly, it’s just easier to find them, because otherwise I have to search through five or six different places to try and find questions, and then figure out if they’ve been asked before, and overlap, and things like that.
01:00:40.225 → 01:00:41.425
Let’s see.
01:00:45.985 → 01:00:55.345
What would be your counterargument to those that argue the Prussian Union in Germany was an example of Christian nationalism, and therefore we have to reject it?
01:00:56.805 → 01:01:03.045
The Prussian Union gets blown out of proportion to some degree.
01:01:03.045 → 01:01:15.225
For those who aren’t familiar, the Prussian Union was basically the leadership of Prussia getting tired of the Lutherans and the Reformed bickering all the time and just being extremely obnoxious, because that’s a problem politically.
01:01:15.225 → 01:01:17.385
The same thing was true during the Reformation.
01:01:17.385 → 01:01:23.525
The emperor was tired of the, in that case, the Roman Catholics and the Lutherans bickering.
01:01:23.525 → 01:01:31.445
And so that’s part of why some of the things he did, he was wrong, but some of the things he did were political considerations because he was tired of the fighting.
01:01:31.445 → 01:01:35.205
And he had other things that were a problem on his doorstep, the Muslims, namely.
01:01:36.485 → 01:01:42.365
But the Prussian Union attempted to get rid of sectarian strife in Germany.
01:01:42.365 → 01:01:43.705
It didn’t succeed.
01:01:43.705 → 01:01:56.345
It’s part of the reason that the founding fathers of the LCMS left Germany and came here because they were able to be Lutheran without having to be sort of shunted in with the reform driving, the reform shunted in with them.
01:01:56.345 → 01:01:58.905
I don’t think what Prussia did was ideal.
01:01:58.905 → 01:02:00.585
I don’t think it was necessarily a good solution.
01:02:00.585 → 01:02:02.985
I understand the political impetus.
01:02:03.125 → 01:02:09.665
I understand the annoyance of having to deal with the conflict, but Scripture is very clear.
01:02:09.665 → 01:02:13.645
There are going to be divisions among you brothers so that the true can stand out, right?
01:02:13.645 → 01:02:15.805
We’re going to have divisions, we’re going to have strife and fights.
01:02:15.805 → 01:02:17.725
That’s just how human beings function.
01:02:17.725 → 01:02:21.685
It will be that way until the parousia, the end of all things.
01:02:21.685 → 01:02:29.005
But how do we deal with the Prussian Union in light of Christian nationalism?
01:02:29.005 → 01:02:35.145
I think we don’t necessarily have to say that we agree with everything that every Christian country has ever done.
01:02:35.145 → 01:02:38.845
It’s a completely ridiculous contention that we would have to do that.
01:02:38.845 → 01:02:45.945
And so we can say that we don’t like what Prussia did, but we do like that Prussia was Christian.
01:02:45.945 → 01:02:59.725
We would have preferred that they had admitted some sort of freedom of denomination, not freedom of religion, which of course is not what the First Amendment means either, because it means freedom of Christian religion, freedom of denomination.
01:02:59.725 → 01:03:04.485
They’re not going to put you in prison for being a Presbyterian or an Anglican, right?
01:03:04.485 → 01:03:14.065
I think the best solution, the cleanest solution, is what was initially tried and worked until the emperor went back on his word.
01:03:14.065 → 01:03:20.625
In the aftermath of the Diet of Worms and all of the Luther stuff, right?
01:03:20.625 → 01:03:24.525
The prince gets to pick what is the religion of his lands.
01:03:24.525 → 01:03:25.525
That works.
01:03:25.525 → 01:03:38.385
In our case, it would probably be something the equivalent of states, perhaps rearranged a little bit more logically than our states, which is to say in line with geography and populations, instead of arbitrary lines on a map.
01:03:38.385 → 01:03:49.485
But if you say that the prince gets to choose which denomination is permitted in his lands, which is the official one, then if you object, you move next door, right?
01:03:49.485 → 01:03:52.605
You move 100 miles to the east, the west, whatever it happens to be.
01:03:52.605 → 01:04:00.265
I think that’s probably the best way to solve the problems, particularly in the US context, because we’re never going to get all Americans to agree, right?
01:04:00.265 → 01:04:10.765
I have no illusions that I’m going to get everyone to become Lutheran, and I hope that no one else has illusions of making everyone Anglican, or Presbyterian, or Baptist, or whatever it happens to be, right?
01:04:10.765 → 01:04:12.505
It’s not going to happen.
01:04:12.505 → 01:04:29.385
And instead of having to fight against our Christian, even if in error, Christian brothers, and thereby commit greater sins, because I don’t think that we’re justified in killing our Christian brothers over this stuff, if we can in any way avoid it.
01:04:29.385 → 01:04:50.085
Instead of going down that path, I think what we have to do is have the prince of whatever territory says, this is the church that’s permitted, you can be a member of that church, or you can worship in your home, that should probably be allowed still, or you can go to the next door territory and be a member of that church.
01:04:51.185 → 01:04:58.825
It solves the problem in a way that doesn’t require violence among Christian brothers, which we should definitely avoid.
01:04:58.825 → 01:05:09.425
We can still have the discussions, we can still have the debates, of course, have those a little more formalized and useful instead of just screaming at each other, which is sort of what social media is for these days.
01:05:09.425 → 01:05:22.705
It has its uses, but I think that’s the solution we’re going to have to follow in the American context in particular, and I wish it is the solution that had been followed by the Prussians, because they could have done that.
01:05:22.705 → 01:05:37.605
It would have been perhaps a little more difficult for them because things were so interspersed, but there’s some of that in the US context, but at the same time, there are very clear centers of gravity for different denominations, right?
01:05:37.605 → 01:05:44.885
You have basically the Scandinavians and the Germanics in the Midwest, and the territory is there.
01:05:44.885 → 01:05:46.525
Well, that’s going to be Lutheran.
01:05:46.525 → 01:05:52.425
And then you have in the south, it’s basically Presbyterians and Baptists and some Methodists and things.
01:05:52.425 → 01:05:54.285
They’re going to sort that out.
01:05:54.285 → 01:06:13.325
But that will avoid the unnecessary and I think sinful conflict while still permitting a particular governing authority to exercise that authority to see that in his belief, in his estimation, and according to his conscience, the faith is taught rightly in his lands.
01:06:13.325 → 01:06:23.985
Because it’s vitally important to remember in all of this, the prince will have to answer to God for the fact that he did or did not see the faith was taught rightly in his lands.
01:06:23.985 → 01:06:25.105
He is responsible for that.
01:06:25.105 → 01:06:28.525
That is one of the duties of the prince, and he will answer to God.
01:06:28.525 → 01:06:33.065
And if he’s going to answer to God, then he has to have the power to do something about it.
01:06:33.065 → 01:06:44.105
So yes, the sovereign, the state, the Christian prince does have the right and the power to say that this denomination is the one that will be acceptable in the lands under my control.
01:06:45.425 → 01:06:52.885
But I do think at that next level up, which, call him an emperor, whatever you want to call him, it hardly matters what the title is.
01:06:52.885 → 01:07:08.485
But the next level up, I think he does have to permit that sort of federation in the lands under him, because it is a greater evil to impose the one denomination, whatever it happens to be, because you are going to have to kill Christian brothers to do that.
01:07:08.485 → 01:07:09.845
And I think that is the greater sin.
01:07:11.885 → 01:07:15.085
So I think that is the short answer to that question.
01:07:23.952 → 01:07:27.652
See if there are any other follow-up questions here.
01:07:30.532 → 01:07:40.132
The question, what is your opinion of how criticism of Israel slash the Jews is being allowed and platformed without them ruining your life?
01:07:40.132 → 01:07:43.152
True, to some degree, to some degree.
01:07:43.152 → 01:07:47.732
But how none of these types are talking about race or solutions?
01:07:50.672 → 01:07:55.332
Sort of a multifaceted question with a multifaceted answer.
01:07:55.332 → 01:08:04.472
Can you talk about the Jews and even racial issues fairly openly on social media and some other places these days?
01:08:04.472 → 01:08:06.912
Obviously, the answer is yes.
01:08:06.912 → 01:08:09.932
I’m talking about it right now, and my stream didn’t just die when I said that.
01:08:10.492 → 01:08:17.392
And I’m currently live on X and Kick and Twitch and YouTube and Rumble, right?
01:08:17.392 → 01:08:20.532
So can you do that?
01:08:20.532 → 01:08:21.892
Yes.
01:08:21.892 → 01:08:26.412
Can you talk about solutions bluntly?
01:08:26.412 → 01:08:27.672
Not really.
01:08:27.672 → 01:08:33.112
That will get you banned and probably a knock on your door if they don’t just break down your door at three in the morning.
01:08:33.112 → 01:08:42.592
And so there are still some limitations, but I think they recognize that if you sort of bottle things up too tightly, right?
01:08:42.592 → 01:08:45.752
You can use sort of the cooking analogy of a pressure cooker.
01:08:45.752 → 01:08:51.092
You bottle up the pressure a little too tightly, it explodes instead of letting off steam.
01:08:51.092 → 01:09:01.072
Does that mean that it’s bad to talk about these issues in a way that isn’t the fullness of it, taking it to its logical conclusions, the solutions and things like that?
01:09:01.072 → 01:09:06.112
No, I don’t think it’s bad because we’re getting more men to recognize the truth, recognize the reality.
01:09:06.112 → 01:09:11.932
It is building up that necessary foundation for the political solutions that follow.
01:09:11.932 → 01:09:18.952
Now, of course, I’m talking about politics in the ultimate theory sense, not politics in the electoral politics sense.
01:09:18.952 → 01:09:22.112
I don’t think that electoral politics has no part to play.
01:09:22.112 → 01:09:24.912
It’s just not the fullness of it, of course.
01:09:24.912 → 01:09:29.692
But even historically, obvious examples, we see electoral politics play a role.
01:09:29.692 → 01:09:44.492
So there’s also the aspect of it, though, that you do have to recognize that they are still going to do a lot to try to destroy you if you talk about these things openly and sort of gain any traction, right?
01:09:44.492 → 01:09:50.072
Unless you’re controlled, because then they let you have a little bit free or leash to some degree.
01:09:50.072 → 01:09:57.892
But if you’re not controlled and you talk about these issues, depending where you are, they are going to come down on you pretty hard.
01:09:57.892 → 01:10:08.952
If you’re in Europe, they’re probably going to raid your home, they’re probably going to take things from your home that you may or may not get back, and if you do, it’ll probably be years later and they’ll be destroyed.
01:10:08.952 → 01:10:11.932
That’s just the reality of it in the European context.
01:10:11.932 → 01:10:17.932
And you’ll be lucky if they don’t send you to prison and you get murdered in your cell by a Muslim prisoner.
01:10:17.932 → 01:10:20.512
That happens more often than you hear about in the news.
01:10:20.512 → 01:10:23.092
That is just sort of how they solve the problem over there.
01:10:23.092 → 01:10:34.132
Or in the case of the AFD in Germany, the Alternative für Deutschland, you have the politicians who were simply assassinated before the last election cycle, and that’s already been memory hold.
01:10:34.132 → 01:10:38.252
Multiple politicians were assassinated right before the election.
01:10:38.252 → 01:10:40.452
That’s just how they conduct business now.
01:10:40.452 → 01:10:45.172
And so there are still very real risks and very real costs.
01:10:45.172 → 01:10:53.772
And you have to also bear in mind, Antifa exists, and they are still the militant wing of the left as they have always been.
01:10:53.772 → 01:11:06.732
And one of the things that the left tries to do is gin up crazy individuals to go out and commit what is, I know the left loves the term and some on the right don’t, but it’s true, stochastic terrorism.
01:11:06.732 → 01:11:13.352
They are trying to gin them up to get them so animated and out of control that they just go and murder people randomly.
01:11:13.352 → 01:11:16.832
Which is politics, of course, in sort of its truest, most brutal sense.
01:11:16.832 → 01:11:27.532
But no, there’s still very real risks of speaking about these things publicly, particularly if you are doing so using your actual name and face.
01:11:27.532 → 01:11:28.072
Sip of tea here.
01:11:34.165 → 01:11:49.105
I think that some people are talking about solutions at this point, because certainly we have some now who are recognizing that, for instance, deportations have to be racially based, not just legal status, so called, because that’s complete nonsense.
01:11:49.105 → 01:12:08.645
So you have those who are talking about the reality of it and what has to be done, but it’s sort of a balancing act, because on the one side, on our side, it’s, you have to go as far as you possibly can without being shut down, because if you get shut down, you get de-platformed, de-personed, de-banked, all those things.
01:12:08.645 → 01:12:10.605
I’ve had some of that stuff happen.
01:12:10.605 → 01:12:18.365
I’m still banned from some of those processors and things, but if that happens to you, you’re obviously much less effective, because no one will ever hear you.
01:12:18.365 → 01:12:24.085
And so when you get people who, they’re usually bad actors, but sometimes they’re just dumb.
01:12:24.085 → 01:12:25.525
There are dumb people as well.
01:12:25.525 → 01:12:30.705
You’ll get people in the comments, they’ll say, well, why didn’t you say what we have to do to fix this problem, and we should go out, and you can’t do that.
01:12:31.465 → 01:12:38.865
That’s dumb, that’s unwise, that is not going to help our cause, it is going to negatively impact our cause.
01:12:38.865 → 01:12:54.625
There will come a time perhaps, hopefully soon, hopefully in the not too distant future, where yes, those things have to be said by our politicians, but we need those men to be available and in positions where they can do it without immediately being destroyed.
01:12:54.625 → 01:12:57.565
So that’s sort of the balancing act on our side.
01:12:57.565 → 01:12:59.625
And then the balancing act on their side is that pressure cooker.
01:13:00.745 → 01:13:04.845
How much can they restrict without it backfiring?
01:13:04.845 → 01:13:10.085
How much can they restrict without actually harming their overall goals?
01:13:10.085 → 01:13:21.805
Now, thankfully, I do think they make a lot of mistakes because they are animated by Satan, and quite frankly, Satan is kind of dumb, because his whole thing is just anti-God, anti-Christ, anti-church.
01:13:21.805 → 01:13:28.165
And so, they’re going to make mistakes because they are driven by an inhuman, a demonic malice.
01:13:29.025 → 01:13:32.205
We have to take advantage of those mistakes.
01:13:32.205 → 01:13:38.845
And so, is it a mistake for them to grant us as much leeway as they are right now?
01:13:38.845 → 01:13:40.145
I think that it is.
01:13:40.145 → 01:13:47.325
And I’m willing to say that, because even if they hear it, they’re not going to change their policies, because again, they’re driven by that demonic malice.
01:13:47.325 → 01:13:50.165
So, it’s a balancing act.
01:13:50.165 → 01:13:51.665
But yes, there are very real costs.
01:13:51.665 → 01:14:01.765
So, if you’re going to stand up and speak the truth on these issues, be prepared for what is going to come your way, particularly if you are a married man with children.
01:14:01.765 → 01:14:06.885
And that’s one of the things that Woe and I pointed out a number of times in Stone Choir.
01:14:06.885 → 01:14:12.045
Of course, we get attacked because, you know, he’s divorced, and I’ve never been married.
01:14:12.045 → 01:14:12.625
I don’t have children.
01:14:12.625 → 01:14:13.825
He doesn’t have children.
01:14:13.825 → 01:14:14.805
We got attacked for that.
01:14:14.805 → 01:14:20.105
But the reality of it is, if I had children, they’d be attacking my wife and children.
01:14:20.105 → 01:14:23.165
So, if I were to get married at some point in the future, they’d attack my wife.
01:14:23.165 → 01:14:33.345
I recognize I would be making her a target to a certain degree, not saying I’m morally culpable for it in that sense, but it would make her a target, because they’re always going to do that.
01:14:33.345 → 01:14:43.445
Just as if you look through comments on any particular thread, you’ll recognize that the reality underlying these things is that they hate ultimately the truth.
01:14:43.445 → 01:14:53.265
They hate God, they hate the idea, but that is sort of devolved to a point where they attack whatever is standing up and speaking that truth.
01:14:53.265 → 01:14:57.925
So, if you’re the person who stands up and does it, then they’ll attack you in any way they possibly can.
01:14:57.925 → 01:15:01.965
And so, you’ll get people who will mention hypocrisy and things like that.
01:15:01.965 → 01:15:05.725
Hypocrisy has nothing to do with any of this, because it’s politics.
01:15:05.725 → 01:15:12.325
It’s pure animalistic, blunt, brutal politics of the most base kind.
01:15:12.325 → 01:15:17.345
And so, you’ll have people on the left who are constantly saying, well, you can’t fat shame, right?
01:15:17.345 → 01:15:20.325
You can’t body shame, you can’t do X, Y, and Z.
01:15:20.325 → 01:15:21.905
You have to love and accept everyone.
01:15:22.625 → 01:15:39.685
But if you stand up and start speaking the truth about God, speaking the truth about race and all these issues, all of these little pet things that they say you can’t critique or comment on, or make a negative comment you have to defend, they will attack you with every last one of those.
01:15:39.685 → 01:15:42.265
You can certainly see it if you scroll through comments on my videos.
01:15:42.265 → 01:15:46.225
You’ll find people who will attack me for having a beard or being bald, right?
01:15:46.225 → 01:15:51.205
Like, okay, I couldn’t possibly care less if I cared I’d be wearing a hat.
01:15:51.845 → 01:15:56.125
The only reason I wore a hat in some videos is because my head is shiny because I’m bald.
01:15:56.125 → 01:15:57.485
I’m aware of that.
01:15:57.485 → 01:15:58.985
I don’t care.
01:15:58.985 → 01:16:09.805
So but they’ll attack you for those things while at the same time, in every other aspect of their life, they’ll say you can’t attack people for those things or anything like that.
01:16:09.805 → 01:16:16.985
Hypocrisy does not play a role when it comes to the left, when it comes to those who are again animated by demonic malice.
01:16:17.945 → 01:16:28.045
So it’s basically somewhat of a warning, I guess, just bear in mind what will come your way if you stand up and speak the truth.
01:16:28.045 → 01:16:32.905
It doesn’t mean you shouldn’t, because in some cases, you’re going to have a duty to do so.
01:16:32.905 → 01:16:42.505
But you are supposed to act in wisdom, because yes, we’re being sent out as sheep among wolves, but at the same time, be wise as serpents.
01:16:42.505 → 01:16:44.625
So hopefully that answers your question there.
01:16:48.485 → 01:16:55.085
The question about the Crusades, I will write that down for next time, since that is actually a really broad topic.
01:16:55.085 → 01:17:02.685
I could give a sort of summary answer, and I had been thinking about the Crusades recently, actually, in response to something.
01:17:02.685 → 01:17:08.545
I was preparing an article that is nowhere near ready to be published, so don’t be looking for that in the near future.
01:17:08.545 → 01:17:11.025
But the Crusades is a pretty broad topic.
01:17:12.585 → 01:17:18.885
I think it’s a 10-volume set that takes up a giant chunk, almost an entire shelf, in one of my bookshelves.
01:17:18.885 → 01:17:26.385
Worth the read, interesting, but only if you’re truly interested in that particular time period in history, because it is quite long.
01:17:30.045 → 01:17:32.305
So, let’s see.
01:17:37.305 → 01:17:39.245
Question on the historical critical method.
01:17:39.245 → 01:17:45.865
I’m going to write that down for next time as well, because that is, again, something that’s probably going to take me 20 minutes to comment on.
01:17:48.265 → 01:17:54.505
Trying to keep my notes a little more organized to make it easier for people to find things in the future, so that I will add it as show notes and things like that.
01:17:55.465 → 01:18:04.345
I think that I may call it a night here since sort of gone for, I mostly want to keep these to about an hour.
01:18:04.345 → 01:18:23.485
I don’t want it to be, you know, not necessarily burdensome, but a huge time commitment for anyone who’s listening, even if you’re listening to the podcast at double speed or something like that, if people want to listen to each one, it tends to be a bit of a commitment, and I know that you have other things going in your life, so you don’t need to listen to me for two hours a week or whatever it happens to be.
01:18:23.585 → 01:18:39.645
Even though I recognize many of you did for Stone Choir, and certainly that’s a different thing, but I do sort of want to try to keep these to an hour each week, and it’s been right about the hour mark now, excluding the intro there.
01:18:39.645 → 01:18:43.685
So I think that will be all for this week.
01:18:43.685 → 01:18:50.325
If there are any additional questions in the chat, I will try to write those down and answer them in the future, which I’ve been trying to do for previous episodes.
01:18:50.325 → 01:18:55.585
If I missed your question, by all means, submit it on the forum or ask it again in chat.
01:18:55.585 → 01:18:57.525
Hopefully, I’ll see it the next time.
01:18:57.525 → 01:18:59.745
And I think that is it for this week.
01:18:59.745 → 01:19:05.325
Thank you for those of you who submitted questions, and thank you for those who participate in the chat.
01:19:05.325 → 01:19:10.705
Particular, again, thanks for those who submitted them on the forum, because that does make my life easier.
01:19:10.705 → 01:19:12.065
And thank you for your time.
01:19:12.065 → 01:19:17.205
I’m glad you were able to join me for this Q&A, the first one of 2026.
01:19:17.205 → 01:19:18.785
Again, happy new year to all of you.
01:19:18.785 → 01:19:19.825
Also, Merry Christmas.
01:19:19.825 → 01:19:26.545
We are still in the season of Christmas, just for a little bit more here, coming up on the next church holiday.
01:19:26.545 → 01:19:29.425
So, I believe that’s all for now.
01:19:29.425 → 01:19:37.465
I hope you all have a wonderful evening, a good weekend, a good rest of what few days are left of the Christmas season.
01:19:37.465 → 01:19:39.085
And may God bless you all.
01:19:39.085 → 01:19:39.645
See you next week.