Topic Suggestion/Request:
Moon Landings and Cui Bono
Reasoning: Cui Bono is Latin for “to whom is the benefit” and I think this phrase is applicable to the moon landings. Assuming arguendo the moon landings did actually happen (I believe that they did), what is the benefit to our people of policing or berating those who question their veracity, when even the men who contributed to the moon landing at least gave the appearance that the moon landing was human progress (e.g., Neil Armstrong “one leap for mankind” quote, “humans” facing challenges, etc.)? I am failing to see how not believing in the moon landings is somehow denigrating White people. It’s clear that Jews have exploited the moon landings to get Whites to believe that Africans could land on the moon, so why is it beyond the realm of possibility that Jews faked the moon landings for expressly this purpose? I’m not saying I believe this, but I can see why many people in our circles do.
One minor concern I do have about the moon landings is that if they actually did occur, why is it that moon tourism has yet to be monetized? If you have time, I was wondering if you could also address this question.
I would put forward the notion that the infinite sea of african niggers and poojeets do not count as ‘man’ and no-one in their right mind thought so at the time either
Obviously I don’t disagree with that, but you are forgetting that the moon landing happened in 1969 (peak boomer years). By this time, plenty of people did believe that Africans and Indians make serious contributions to society. You appear to be saying that Neil Armstrong wasn’t in his right mind. What I’m saying is good luck trying to convince White people of that. It’s almost just as easy to say that it never happened as it is to accept the moon landing’s soiled legacy.
I’m not reaching “dude”. Even if US was still racist in 1969, it’s difficult to come back from Armstrong’s quote. I remember learning about the moon landing in elementary school and that was one of the first things we learned about it. Also, it’s not difficult to see how the notion of “putting a man on the moon” (as opposed to a White man) can easily be exploited by the tiny hats. You can’t blame White people who are racially aware for not believing in the moon landings.
Re-shading history long after the fact is very jewish and in that regard they can potentially use whatever they want. A good example would be churchill, who was broadly disliked and basically washed out of politics after the disastrous end to the war. His entire post-war reputation is synthetic and established long after the fact.
The fact is, 100 million white men went to the moon alone. When a white guy gets off his space ship built by white men and says ‘this is one giant leap for mankind’ they weren’t imagining anything other than more white men doing the exact same thing they were. It is moronic to say that any plain and easy-to-interpret phrase should not have been uttered because it could be re-shaded by jews later. That is true of literally everything.
Meanwhile, jews in america will later deny the moon landing, because their morass of retarded brown hybrids cannot recreate that, even with access to a much higher base level of technology. It will be easier for them to say that it was a lie told by white men to ‘keep them down’ and that it is flat out impossible to do, because they know they cant do it.
How is “mankind” easily interpreted as “White men”? Maybe Neil Armstrong did mean White men when he said “mankind”, but that’s simply not what he said. It’s actually not that difficult to be vocally zealous for your own race, rather than using ambiguous words like “mankind”. For example, I can think of a guy from 1940’s Germany who probably would’ve worded it differently.
That’s the first I’ve heard of the theory of jews lying about the moon landings in order to convince blacks that they’ve been “oppressed” by Whites. I’m not saying that’s not possible, but that’s not what I hear from people who don’t believe in the moon landings, at least in our circles. The reasons I’ve heard include the promotion of “science” as a replacement to God (think “I f**king love science”), or as I’ve already alluded to, to get people to think that “we’re all on the same team trying to get to the moon”. Regardless, I don’t think if most people were to stop believing in the moon landing that blacks would feel that White people lied to them.
I’m not disputing that the moon landing happened. I’m just not seeing the benefit to dying on this hill. It’s not a racial issue.