I am writing in direct response to your recent post concerning the duty to love our women, even when they have become enforcers of the present system. I find myself wrestling with how to apply this principle to a particular reality.
We frequently see a type of woman today—often cloaked in the performative, lukewarm Christianity of the modern evangelical milieu—who acts as a militant agent of the feminist religion. These women are not merely passive victims of a failing system; they actively weaponize state and legal institutions to dismantle their own households through fabricated abuse claims, parental alienation, and the kidnapping of their own children, all while maintaining a facade of piety.
When a woman has consciously abandoned her head and the domestic order to serve this ‘other’ religion, and continues to actively persecute the father of her children through the state, how do we reconcile the duty to ‘will her good’ with the reality of her role as an active adversary? At what point does she move from being a ‘fallen’ woman deserving of our pity to being a willful enemy of the household and the faith? I would appreciate your thoughts on where the boundary lies between a woman in need of restoration and a woman who has chosen the path of the destroyer.